On New Year’s Eve there were plenty of places that hosted parties, competing with each other over rosters of artists and celebrities, as well as the magnificence of their fireworks displays.
Taipei 101’s brilliant and colorful fireworks displays captivate the attention of Taiwanese and are frequently featured in international media.
However, fireworks displays are a double-edged sword. From a tourism perspective, the New Year’s Eve fireworks consistently attract large crowds and create business opportunities, boosting the local economy.
Many restaurants on upper floors near Taipei 101 are fully booked months in advance, while hotels with views of the show have 90 percent occupancy. The economic benefits cannot be denied.
However, the shows are not without significant costs. In addition to the air pollution and the messes left by crowds, they also pose significant safety risks.
At Taichung’s New Year’s Eve fireworks display, embers and sparks from the fireworks fell into the crowd, injuring a six-year-old girl and starting a fire in vegetation.
Moreover, fireworks displays are expensive — many regions across Taiwan budget hundreds of millions of New Taiwan dollars for them.
In the past few years, with a rise in environmental awareness, many temples have banned the burning of incense to decrease air pollution, so it seems ironic that government departments spend so much money on fireworks.
Aside from New Year’s Eve and Double Ten National Day, local governments also use fireworks to attract tourists, such as the Penghu International Fireworks Festival. In the event’s earlier years, the event was good for Penghu’s rather sluggish tourism industry.
However, fireworks lack local character and the displays are uniform.
Meanwhile, Penghu’s other attractions have not evolved, leading many tourists to stay away outside the festival.
Fireworks are by no means a cure-all — the decrease in Penghu’s tourism in recent years is evidence.
Fireworks are a feast for the eyes, but with their fading brilliance comes potential harms. The trade-off between environmental pollution and tourism lacks a short-term solution, but finding a balance between the two is a crucial issue that must be addressed. Through proper management and control, it is possible to maximize the benefits of fireworks displays while mitigating their environmental impact.
The authorities must work harder to realize that goal.
Wen Shun-te is a senior-high school principal.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then