Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs Takeshi Iwaya met with his Chinese counterpart, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅), in Beijing on Wednesday last week. To Japan, this was directly related to the high likelihood of South Korea’s left-leaning Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung winning South Korea’s probable presidential election this year. His win would have little if any direct impact on Taiwan.
South Korea’s political right holds a friendlier view of Japan, while its political left has a degree of enmity toward Japan. This is clearly shown in the attitudes toward Japan of former South Korean president Moon Jae-in and the suspended President Yoon Suk-yeol. Yoon’s friendliness toward Tokyo was supported by reliance on intelligence cooperation in military affairs, and gained the endorsement of South Korea’s chaebol conglomerate business empires. After Yoon’s inauguration, he led an economic entourage on an official visit to Japan, with former Samsung Electronics Corp executive chairman Jay Y. Lee and Hyundai Motor Group executive chairman Chung Eui-sun in attendance.
After Yoon met with then-Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida, South Korean tourists flocked to Japan, breaking a 10-year record and surging past the number of Chinese visitors.
Koreanic and Japonic language and cultural families have millennia-old ties, and the two peoples have long had close relations and contact. Early in Japan’s history, many peoples from the Korean Peninsula and even the Korean royal family migrated to Japan, marrying into Japan’s aristocracy and helping to create a settled agrarian society.
Fast-forward to modern history, and the two lands have enjoyed much the same technology and capital. Former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe led Japan for more than a decade, during which diplomatic relations with South Korea were largely disregarded, a situation that only got worse during Moon’s administration. China was able to replace South Korea in export trade and became the largest supplier of Japan’s foreign labor pool.
It is good that Japan’s relations with South Korea could continue following Yoon’s ousting. However, because of his short-lived declaration of martial law, Yoon, as well as the subsequent acting president, Han Duck-soo, were impeached. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba views the Yoon government as being on its way out.
It is unknown whether relations would return to past enmities. South Korea’s political left and Japan’s political right could force bilateral ties to nosedive. Both countries are unable to completely sever ties, but Japan has no real love for China. China has little to offer Japan other than being a source of foreign laborers and tourism, but these are viewed as “following in South Korea’s shadow in opposing Japan.”
If China-Japan ties warm up, Taiwan would need to make greater overtures toward South Korea. Even if Lee Jae-myung would lead South Korea closer to North Korea and China, doing so would not be a huge issue for Taiwan, as South Korea has had a decade of experience in its government handling bumpy scenarios. Its left and right-wing politicians would not be fooled.
Taiwan-South Korea ties rely on industrial and political connections to reduce blowback from improvements in Japan-China relations. The government should aid the development of markets and political connections with South Korea’s ethnic Chinese community, related civic groups and hometown associations.
In doing so, Taiwan could collect intelligence on these groups’ pro-Beijing penetration to figure out a way to effectively grow ties with South Korea.
Wang Wen-sheng is a retired political operations officer and doctoral candidate researching the history of Australia and New Zealand’s ties with Oceania.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for