On Sunday, the Liberty Times (Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published an article by a teacher, Lee Yi-nung (黎亦農) titled: “Reflections on high-school boys putting together groups to support McDonald’s.”
The response piece is related to a story from last month about several male high-school students, many of whom attend the elite Taipei Municipal Jianguo High School, making misogynistic comments online mocking the suicide of a female employee of a Shilin District (士林) branch of McDonald’s after she was allegedly sexually assaulted by her manager for more than one year.
Lee made the point that a small number of male high-school students’ bad behavior “being self-centered and lacking compassion” has roots in the intellectual axis of the nation’s “new curriculum,” but this is unfounded.
The same crop of rice nourishes an entire populace. We do not need to put the blame for all of society’s ills at the foot of our national education curriculum.
Education could reduce the need for prison cells, but it could only do so up to a point — it cannot render them redundant. Neither could an open and democratic society extinguish the lack of compassion through the malicious words and deeds of a minority of people — it could only use education to steer mindsets toward fairness and justice.
Hopefully, these students, through their schooling and social discourse, have received a profoundly reflective lesson on women’s equality after the uproar surrounding their behavior.
The progression of our technological development, paired with differing opinions from our democratic society’s diverse ecosystem of information and a flourishing online world, have formed caustic communities with speech and behavior that evince a severe lack of civic, socially beneficial and constructive personal conduct. It is not surprising that such commentary keeps coming to light. This is not a curriculum issue.
This incident is not the only example. Former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is alleged to have verbally abused female representatives, and a cohort from the same school’s alumni association had allegedly posted an image of a “menu” consisting of 30 “dishes” with culinary names that objectified women.
That such behavior could come from students with some of the highest ranking scores on the nation’s standardized tests and who successfully reach the highest institutions of secondary education is evidence that their behavior has nothing to do with schools or education.
The problem is rooted in the cultivation of personal values and upbringing. When a high-school student exhibits behavior that shows such a lack of compassion or empathy, the matter boils down to how that individual was raised or influenced by family members and their living environment.
Caustic Internet commentators and online trolls pursue speech and behavior that runs counter to the mainstream because they want attention.
Regardless of these students’ vaunted educational pedigrees at elite institutions, they cannot avoid the reach of our fair and just society, with its unequivocal and overwhelming response that forces them to reckon with where exactly they went wrong.
From the sincere public apology by the administrations of the schools involved in this incident and the alumni who created that misogynistic “menu,” to the strong critical response from public discourse, at least one facet of the online community inhabited by Taiwan’s diverse society still possesses the capacity to hold social fairness and justice in high regard.
Liu Shih-ming is an adjunct associate professor at the National Taipei University of Education’s Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture.
Translated by Tim Smith
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS