On Sunday, the Liberty Times (Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published an article by a teacher, Lee Yi-nung (黎亦農) titled: “Reflections on high-school boys putting together groups to support McDonald’s.”
The response piece is related to a story from last month about several male high-school students, many of whom attend the elite Taipei Municipal Jianguo High School, making misogynistic comments online mocking the suicide of a female employee of a Shilin District (士林) branch of McDonald’s after she was allegedly sexually assaulted by her manager for more than one year.
Lee made the point that a small number of male high-school students’ bad behavior “being self-centered and lacking compassion” has roots in the intellectual axis of the nation’s “new curriculum,” but this is unfounded.
The same crop of rice nourishes an entire populace. We do not need to put the blame for all of society’s ills at the foot of our national education curriculum.
Education could reduce the need for prison cells, but it could only do so up to a point — it cannot render them redundant. Neither could an open and democratic society extinguish the lack of compassion through the malicious words and deeds of a minority of people — it could only use education to steer mindsets toward fairness and justice.
Hopefully, these students, through their schooling and social discourse, have received a profoundly reflective lesson on women’s equality after the uproar surrounding their behavior.
The progression of our technological development, paired with differing opinions from our democratic society’s diverse ecosystem of information and a flourishing online world, have formed caustic communities with speech and behavior that evince a severe lack of civic, socially beneficial and constructive personal conduct. It is not surprising that such commentary keeps coming to light. This is not a curriculum issue.
This incident is not the only example. Former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is alleged to have verbally abused female representatives, and a cohort from the same school’s alumni association had allegedly posted an image of a “menu” consisting of 30 “dishes” with culinary names that objectified women.
That such behavior could come from students with some of the highest ranking scores on the nation’s standardized tests and who successfully reach the highest institutions of secondary education is evidence that their behavior has nothing to do with schools or education.
The problem is rooted in the cultivation of personal values and upbringing. When a high-school student exhibits behavior that shows such a lack of compassion or empathy, the matter boils down to how that individual was raised or influenced by family members and their living environment.
Caustic Internet commentators and online trolls pursue speech and behavior that runs counter to the mainstream because they want attention.
Regardless of these students’ vaunted educational pedigrees at elite institutions, they cannot avoid the reach of our fair and just society, with its unequivocal and overwhelming response that forces them to reckon with where exactly they went wrong.
From the sincere public apology by the administrations of the schools involved in this incident and the alumni who created that misogynistic “menu,” to the strong critical response from public discourse, at least one facet of the online community inhabited by Taiwan’s diverse society still possesses the capacity to hold social fairness and justice in high regard.
Liu Shih-ming is an adjunct associate professor at the National Taipei University of Education’s Graduate School of Taiwanese Culture.
Translated by Tim Smith
Recently, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) hastily pushed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) through the Legislative Yuan, sparking widespread public concern. The legislative process was marked by opaque decisionmaking and expedited proceedings, raising alarms about its potential impact on the economy, national defense, and international standing. Those amendments prioritize short-term political gains at the expense of long-term national security and development. The amendments mandate that the central government transfer about NT$375.3 billion (US$11.47 billion) annually to local governments. While ostensibly aimed at enhancing local development, the lack
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Having enjoyed contributing regular essays to the Liberty Times and Taipei Times now for several years, I feel it is time to pull back. As some of my readers know, I have enjoyed a decades-long relationship with Taiwan. My most recent visit was just a few months ago, when I was invited to deliver a keynote speech at a major conference in Taipei. Unfortunately, my trip intersected with Double Ten celebrations, so I missed the opportunity to call on friends in government, as well as colleagues in the new AIT building, that replaced the old Xin-yi Road complex. I have
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
RSS