Taiwan’s political arena has long been a stage for high-stakes confrontations, but recent events have exposed new cracks in its democratic framework. As rival parties clash over competing visions for the nation’s future, the legislative process has increasingly become a battlefield where governance and partisanship collide, leaving citizens questioning whether their interests are being heard amid the noise.
The Legislative Yuan on Dec. 20 passed three controversial bills: the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), and the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法).
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) finds itself in a weaker position in the newly formed Legislative Yuan. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), having secured 52 seats in the latest election, has allied with the Taiwan People’s Party under the coordination of KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), effectively taking control of the legislature.
With this majority, the KMT has swiftly advanced a series of bills, intensifying the political standoff. The tensions in the Legislative Yuan feel even more intense than during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration.
The KMT has shown little regard for the backlash it faced in May when the “Bluebird movement” protested its disregard for the legislative process. Instead of reflecting on this opposition, the KMT has doubled down on its hardline tactics against the DPP. For example, in handling the three bills, the KMT dismissed the “Bluebird movement” as nothing more than a DPP echo chamber. This suggests the party sees little risk in continuing its aggressive approach.
Recently, the KMT even asked Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to delay sending the allocation and election bills to the Executive Yuan. This is a move that undermines the neutrality of his role and attempts to block the DPP’s administrative actions.
Faced with such a tough political environment, the DPP has found itself on shaky ground. Taking the government revenue allocation act as an example, the DPP has struggled to reconcile its past positions — such as its earlier support for reforms to the law — with its current stance. The lack of a clear and convincing explanation has left many wondering which direction the party is really heading in.
When it comes to actions, the DPP has often leaned on portraying itself as a victim, while labeling its opponents as “Chinese Communist Party collaborators.” This approach might rally its core supporters in the short term, but it does little to win over floating voters. Over time, even loyal backers might start asking: “What exactly are we fighting for?”
The number of protesters in the “Bluebird movement” has significantly decreased compared with May last year. If the conflicts between the legislative and executive branches persist, the public might increasingly question whether President Williams Lai’s (賴清德) statement of achieving “greater democracy to solve democratic problems” is anything more than a slogan.
The rushed passage of the allocation bill, with little debate, only fueled perceptions that this was a political power play rather than genuine policy reform.
Besides the administrative actions that have already been widely discussed, the DPP could counter by exploiting divisions within the KMT. For instance, Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) recently asked KMT Legislator Ko Chih-en (柯志恩), a potential mayoral candidate, why Kaohsiung received the lowest budget share. Ko’s candid reply was: “Fu Kun-chi is beyond my control.” This revealed internal doubts about Fu’s leadership style, which does not necessarily align with the interests of all KMT lawmakers. These internal cracks might give the DPP an opening to counter the KMT’s strong-arm tactics.
While Taiwan’s domestic politics seldom capture global attention, political instability here is not something the international community wants to see, given Taiwan’s importance to regional security. The ruling and opposition parties need to recognize that a stable political environment is essential to Taiwan’s global standing.
Taiwanese expect their leaders to provide clear direction in chaotic times. It is not just a responsibility; it is crucial for building trust at home and abroad.
Yang Chun-huei is a senior journalist specializing in Taiwan’s politics and Pacific regional affairs.
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
Deflation in China is persisting, raising growing concerns domestically and internationally. Beijing’s stimulus policies introduced in September last year have largely been short-lived in financial markets and negligible in the real economy. Recent data showing disproportionately low bank loan growth relative to the expansion of the money supply suggest the limited effectiveness of the measures. Many have urged the government to take more decisive action, particularly through fiscal expansion, to avoid a deep deflationary spiral akin to Japan’s experience in the early 1990s. While Beijing’s policy choices remain uncertain, questions abound about the possible endgame for the Chinese economy if no decisive
Actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) on March 13 posted an Instagram caption after the opening of Tiffany’s Taipei flagship store two days earlier that read: “Thank you Tiffany for inviting us to Taipei China.” We know that Yeoh knows Taipei is in Taiwan, not China, because the caption was posted following comments she made — in English — in which she said: “Thank you to Tiffany for bringing me to Taipei, because I do love this country very much.” Her remarks and the subsequent Instagram caption were reported in Taiwan, in Chinese and English- language media such as Radio Free Asia, and overseas,
China poses a dire threat to Taiwan’s semiconductor industry as it steps up efforts to poach Taiwan’s top chip talent, following the US’ implementation of stringent chip restrictions. Beijing is keen to develop its own semiconductor technologies, leveraging skilled engineers from Taiwan, Europe and other countries to circumvent US restrictions on providing China access to advanced US chips, particularly those used in artificial intelligence applications, as well as other chip technologies and manufacturing equipment. Taiwan has always contended with talent competition from China, but the situation is worsening. The Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office on Friday said that China’s ARK Semi and
RSS