Taiwan’s political arena has long been a stage for high-stakes confrontations, but recent events have exposed new cracks in its democratic framework. As rival parties clash over competing visions for the nation’s future, the legislative process has increasingly become a battlefield where governance and partisanship collide, leaving citizens questioning whether their interests are being heard amid the noise.
The Legislative Yuan on Dec. 20 passed three controversial bills: the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法), and the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法).
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) finds itself in a weaker position in the newly formed Legislative Yuan. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), having secured 52 seats in the latest election, has allied with the Taiwan People’s Party under the coordination of KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), effectively taking control of the legislature.
With this majority, the KMT has swiftly advanced a series of bills, intensifying the political standoff. The tensions in the Legislative Yuan feel even more intense than during former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration.
The KMT has shown little regard for the backlash it faced in May when the “Bluebird movement” protested its disregard for the legislative process. Instead of reflecting on this opposition, the KMT has doubled down on its hardline tactics against the DPP. For example, in handling the three bills, the KMT dismissed the “Bluebird movement” as nothing more than a DPP echo chamber. This suggests the party sees little risk in continuing its aggressive approach.
Recently, the KMT even asked Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to delay sending the allocation and election bills to the Executive Yuan. This is a move that undermines the neutrality of his role and attempts to block the DPP’s administrative actions.
Faced with such a tough political environment, the DPP has found itself on shaky ground. Taking the government revenue allocation act as an example, the DPP has struggled to reconcile its past positions — such as its earlier support for reforms to the law — with its current stance. The lack of a clear and convincing explanation has left many wondering which direction the party is really heading in.
When it comes to actions, the DPP has often leaned on portraying itself as a victim, while labeling its opponents as “Chinese Communist Party collaborators.” This approach might rally its core supporters in the short term, but it does little to win over floating voters. Over time, even loyal backers might start asking: “What exactly are we fighting for?”
The number of protesters in the “Bluebird movement” has significantly decreased compared with May last year. If the conflicts between the legislative and executive branches persist, the public might increasingly question whether President Williams Lai’s (賴清德) statement of achieving “greater democracy to solve democratic problems” is anything more than a slogan.
The rushed passage of the allocation bill, with little debate, only fueled perceptions that this was a political power play rather than genuine policy reform.
Besides the administrative actions that have already been widely discussed, the DPP could counter by exploiting divisions within the KMT. For instance, Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) recently asked KMT Legislator Ko Chih-en (柯志恩), a potential mayoral candidate, why Kaohsiung received the lowest budget share. Ko’s candid reply was: “Fu Kun-chi is beyond my control.” This revealed internal doubts about Fu’s leadership style, which does not necessarily align with the interests of all KMT lawmakers. These internal cracks might give the DPP an opening to counter the KMT’s strong-arm tactics.
While Taiwan’s domestic politics seldom capture global attention, political instability here is not something the international community wants to see, given Taiwan’s importance to regional security. The ruling and opposition parties need to recognize that a stable political environment is essential to Taiwan’s global standing.
Taiwanese expect their leaders to provide clear direction in chaotic times. It is not just a responsibility; it is crucial for building trust at home and abroad.
Yang Chun-huei is a senior journalist specializing in Taiwan’s politics and Pacific regional affairs.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS