In the annals of history, few US presidents have demonstrated such an unwavering commitment to human rights and global peace as former US president Jimmy Carter. His friendship with the Dalai Lama and support for the Tibetan cause stand as a testament to his enduring legacy of compassion and justice.
Carter and the Dalai Lama first crossed paths in the late 20th century, united by their shared commitment to peace, human rights and spiritual values. Carter, a devout Christian, and the Dalai Lama, a Buddhist spiritual leader, found common ground in their belief in the power of compassion and dialogue. This bond was not merely symbolic; it was rooted in a mutual respect and a shared vision for a more just and peaceful world.
During his presidency (1977-1981), Carter made human rights a cornerstone of his foreign policy. He believed that the US had a moral obligation to support oppressed peoples worldwide, including the Tibetans under Chinese rule. Carter’s administration was one of the first to publicly acknowledge the human rights abuses in Tibet, bringing international attention to the plight of the Tibetan people.
After leaving office, Carter continued to champion the cause of Tibet through the Carter Center, an organization he founded to advance human rights and alleviate human suffering. He used his platform to advocate for the Tibetan people’s right to self-determination and to call for dialogue between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama. His efforts were not without risk, as they often put him at odds with powerful political interests.
The Dalai Lama has often spoken of his deep admiration for Carter, describing him as a true friend of Tibet. On Carter’s 100th birthday, the Dalai Lama sent a heartfelt message, praising his lifelong dedication to peace and human rights. This enduring friendship is a powerful reminder of the impact that principled leadership can have on global issues.
Carter’s friendship with the Dalai Lama and his unwavering support for the Tibetan cause highlight the profound impact of moral leadership. In a world often driven by political expediency, Carter’s legacy serves as a beacon of hope and a call to action for future leaders to prioritize human rights and compassion in their policies.
His life and work remind us that true leadership is not measured by power or popularity, but by the courage to stand up for what is right.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS