US president-elect Donald Trump’s surprise threat to retake control of the Panama Canal and his expansionist declaration that the US should own Greenland signal that the incoming US president would pursue a foreign policy unbounded by diplomatic niceties.
As Trump prepares to take office on Jan. 20, his aides have been preparing him to deal with two foreign policy crises: War in Ukraine and multiple conflicts in the Middle East, both of which the president-elect has promised to speedily resolve.
However, on Sunday, Trump was more focused on making threats against US allies like Panama and Denmark, which controls Greenland as an overseas territory. In previous weeks, it has been Canada which has had to weather his trolling that it should become the 51st state of the US.
Illustration: Tania Chou
Defenders of Trump’s approach say he is merely a forceful advocate of “America First” policies. That means brusquely defending America’s interests — economic or otherwise — when dealing with friends and largely disregarding consequences allies might face.
“The idea is that what’s good for America is good for the rest of the world,” said Victoria Coates, a high-ranking national security official during Trump’s first term. “So he takes a clear-eyed look at what are America’s interests in any given situation.”
In the case of Panama, Trump said the US should reassert control of the vital Central American waterway because Panama was charging shippers too much to use it, an allegation the Panamanian president vehemently denied.
Speaking to a crowd of supporters in Arizona, Trump said he would not let the canal fall into the “wrong hands,” warning of potential Chinese influence on the passage.
Two Trump foreign policy advisers, speaking on condition of anonymity, argued he was addressing a larger issue, one which they expect to be a focus of his second term: Growing Chinese influence over governments and economies in Latin America.
China does not control or administer the canal, but a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings has long managed two ports located on the canal’s Caribbean and Pacific entrances.
“It’s all about leverage and flexing. The number two user of the Panama Canal is China and he’s trying to thwart their influence in Latin America,” said Tricia McLaughlin, an adviser to Vivek Ramaswamy, Trump’s choice to cochair a government efficiency commission with Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
Detractors point out his approach risks alienating key allies.
In some cases, public bullying could push natural friends into the orbit of competing major powers, like China and Russia, or make them less likely to strike an economic or security-focused deal with the US, they say.
Mayer Mizrachi Matalon, the conservative mayor of Panama City who has worn a Trump “Make America Great Again” hat, issued a blistering statement on Sunday. “We are not, nor will we ever be, a 51st state,” he said.
John Bolton, Trump’s national security adviser in his first term who has since turned on the former president, said there are legitimate debates over the premiums Panama charges for passage through the canal, and also Greenland’s strategic importance to the US and NATO.
However, Trump is endangering the chance to have those discussions “because he couldn’t keep his mouth shut,” he added.
Trump was not averse to rebuking or threatening allies during his first term, especially European members of NATO, who Trump accused of spending too little on the alliance’s military defense.
Yet threatening such geographically close allies such as Canada and Panama weeks before he even takes office appears to show a greater willingness to use US power as a blunt instrument to extract concessions.
The White House declined to comment. Trump’s transition team did not respond to a request for comment.
On Sunday, Trump resurrected in a statement an idea he floated during his first term — that the US should buy Greenland, which has become an increasingly important strategic territory as Arctic trading routes open up due to climate change.
Some officials involved in the transition or close to Trump have informally discussed in recent weeks what an acquisition of the Danish territory would look like, three of those people told Reuters.
One potential option would be signing with Greenland a Compact of Free Association (COFA), should the island become fully independent from Denmark, which some polls have shown Greenlanders support in the long term.
Under a COFA, which the US currently holds with three Pacific island states, there is an extremely high degree of economic integration between the US and the relevant foreign country, though the foreign country remains independent.
Danish officials rebuffed Trump when he first expressed interest in acquiring the island during his first term, but he never lost interest in the idea, two of the associates and transition advisers said.
In recent weeks Trump has also mused about turning Canada into a US state, an idea that has little basis in reality, experts say.
Yet there is strategic thinking behind Trump’s trolling, said Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is unpopular at home and facing mounting calls to resign, Abrams noted. Trump has pledged to slap tariffs on Canadian imports unless it reduces the flow of migrants and drugs into the US.
“Trump is piling the pressure on Trudeau, I think it’s part of a negotiation over tariffs,” Abrams said. “I think you’ll see the same thing with Mexico at some point.”
McLaughlin, Ramaswamy’s adviser, agreed, saying: “It’s a message to Trudeau that you and Canada are the little brother. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you until you have paid your fair share in tariffs.”
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic