TikTok a national security risk
A deepfake video of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) recently spread on TikTok and Line in Taiwan. Ker filed a complaint with the authorities and urged the public not to share the video.
TikTok is a tool for cognitive warfare by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and it has escalated its efforts. While the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) camps in the legislature passed three controversial bills, Ker held a news conference criticizing the KMT and TPP for endangering the nation and disrupting governance.
Meanwhile, a video with simplified Chinese subtitles, a Chinese-accented voiceover and content slandering the ruling DPP appeared on TikTok. Although those with discerning eyes could immediately recognize it as a fake, its provocative nature, rapid release and intent to mislead are alarming.
Taiwan should take the influence of TikTok seriously and observe how other countries regulate the platform. The US and EU have banned the use of TikTok on government devices due to concerns user data collected by the platform could be transmitted to the Chinese government, posing a threat to national security. The UK found that TikTok breached data privacy laws and might have improperly used data from young users. For security reasons, it has also banned TikTok on government devices. India banned TikTok due to its content inciting social unrest, promoting violence and negatively affecting mental health. Albania announced a one-year ban on TikTok that started on Saturday, citing concerns over the harmful effects of violent videos on teenagers.
The main argument against a ban is that it could harm freedom of speech in democratic countries. However, the CCP is exploiting the shield of free speech to undermine democracies. Taiwan should prioritize national security over freedom of speech, as freedom cannot exist without a secure nation.
Moreover, freedom of speech does not equate to unrestricted use of technology. Allowing TikTok to freely exploit user data in Taiwan creates significant vulnerabilities in national security and individual privacy.
Social media is not limited to TikTok — Taiwan offers a diverse range of alternatives, such as Instagram, Threads and YouTube. The reasons to ban TikTok go beyond its role as a tool for CCP political warfare. Its negative impact on mental health and the spread of misinformation undermine Taiwan’s stability and serve as evidence for international restrictions on TikTok. Taiwan must take decisive action to incorporate a TikTok ban into its long-term strategy for sustainable security.
Chan Jen-hsin
Taoyuan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not