Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto recently made a controversial statement that sparked significant public reaction in Indonesia. While attending the Developing Eight (D8) Summit in Egypt on Wednesday last week, Prabowo addressed Indonesian students and suggested he was considering a plan to pardon corrupt officials, provided they return the state funds they embezzled. He claimed this proposal was part of a corruption eradication strategy focused on recovering state assets.
This statement has drawn sharp criticism from civil society groups and anti-corruption activists in Indonesia. They argue that forgiving corrupt officials reflects a flawed understanding on the part of Prabowo and his administration about how to combat corruption. Such a policy, they contend, undermines the anti-corruption initiatives that have been painstakingly developed since the Reformasi era.
Corruption is not merely an administrative breach, but a grave criminal offense — an extraordinary crime — that erodes public trust and weakens the foundation of the rule of law. Within the hierarchy of crimes, corruption is on par with other serious offenses such as terrorism and human trafficking due to its systemic and far-reaching consequences.
Instead of proposing forgiveness for corruption — a move that would clearly harm the sense of justice and erode public confidence in the government — Prabowo should consider learning from Taiwan’s efforts.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰), speaking at the opening of this year’s Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) assessor training workshop in Taipei in October, introduced the “ABC strategy,” which stands for adaptation, blocking and cooperation.
Taiwan has adopted this strategy to advance efforts to prevent money laundering and combat the financing of terrorism, as well as to address corruption and other extraordinary crimes, Cho said.
Adaptation involves adopting policies and regulations that explicitly prohibit corruption, while strengthening law enforcement measures, including whistle-blower protections and the oversight of procurement processes. It also includes adopting advanced technologies, such as e-government systems, blockchain for procurement and secure online reporting mechanisms, to reduce opportunities for corruption. Furthermore, adaptation requires embedding anti-corruption education in schools, universities and workplaces to foster awareness and integrity across society.
Blocking focuses on eliminating opportunities for corruption through robust oversight mechanisms. This entails building effective internal and external audit systems, and engaging independent institutions to monitor budget usage. Blocking also means safeguarding legal processes, official appointments and decisionmaking procedures from political interference.
Cooperation highlights the importance of cross-border collaboration, as corruption often involves international money flows. Therefore, it is crucial to work together with other countries, international organizations and global financial institutions to trace and recover embezzled assets. Cooperation with civil society, the media and academia is equally essential for enhancing monitoring and accountability in anti-corruption policies.
Rather than offering amnesty to corrupt officials, Prabowo should take inspiration from Taiwan’s commitment to eradicating corruption. The Indonesian government would benefit from adopting the “ABC strategy” as part of a comprehensive anti-corruption initiative, with Taiwan serving as a valuable benchmark for best practices.
Najamuddin Khairur Rijal is an associate professor in the International Relations Department of the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Indonesia.
In September 2015, Russia intervened militarily in Syria’s civil war, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship as it teetered on the brink of collapse. This was the high point of Russia’s resurgence on the world stage and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ability to tilt the war in al-Assad’s favor helped make him a regional power broker. In addition to enhancing Putin’s stature, the operation led to strategic gains that gave Russia leverage vis-a-vis regional and Western powers. Syria was thus a status symbol for the Kremlin. Putin, who sees Russia as a great power on par with the US and China, attaches
With Washington substantially off-guard in power transition, China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), is intensifying an anti-corruption campaign against the top military leadership. At a glance, the move seems to be consistent with his emphasis on the necessity of enhancing military preparedness for a possible full military invasion of Taiwan, because the military is required to be well-disciplined without corruption. Looking carefully, however, a series of purges of several top military leaders since last year begs the question of what dynamics has worked behind the anomaly. More specifically, general Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and his immediate successor, Li Shangfu (李尚福), were removed as People’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
RSS