Taiwan’s first batch of M1A2T tanks, a specialized version of the US-made M1A2 Abrams, arrived at the Port of Taipei this month. Approved for sale in 2019 during the administration of then-US president Donald Trump, the deal includes 108 tanks and related equipment at a total cost of NT$40.5 billion (US$1.24 billion). The delivery schedule comprises three phases: 38 tanks this year, 42 next year and the remaining 28 in 2026. The M1A2T is equipped with 120mm smoothbore guns, capable of penetrating 850mm-thick armor, and incorporates advanced hunter-killer targeting systems. This acquisition represents Taiwan’s first significant upgrade in armored vehicles since it received M60A3 tanks in 1994.
When the deal was sealed in 2019, the Ministry of National Defense and military officials praised the tanks for their firepower, mobility and ability to engage targets from elevated positions, arguing that they outperform China’s Type 99 and Type 63A tanks. In theory, the M1A2Ts significantly enhance Taiwan’s anti-landing defense capabilities in alignment with the country’s multilayered line of defense. While Taiwan emphasizes its focus on sea and air defenses in a potential conflict, the M1A2T is expected to provide critical ground firepower in countering a Chinese land invasion.
Despite their advanced capabilities, the M1A2Ts come with significant challenges, particularly for Taiwan’s defensive requirements. Tanks are developed with specific operational contexts in mind, and the Abrams was originally designed for tank-on-tank battles on open plains. Over four decades of use in conflicts such as Iraq and Kosovo, the M1 Abrams has undergone substantial upgrades, but these have also increased its weight and cost. The first-generation models weighed about 50 tonnes, but the current versions can reach up to 70 tonnes, requiring specialized transport equipment that might not be readily available in Taiwan.
The M1A2s are also among the most expensive in the world, not only in procurement, but also in maintenance and operational costs. Unlike diesel-powered tanks, the M1A2 uses a 1500 horsepower gas turbine engine fueled by gasoline or jet fuel. While this engine offers faster performance and quieter operation, it consumes significantly more fuel, limiting the tank’s range and complicating logistics, especially under a potential Chinese blockade. Taiwan’s terrain adds further complications. The nation’s rugged topography, limited plains, dense water networks and bridges not designed to withstand such heavy loads limit the mobility and effectiveness of the M1A2Ts. In urban warfare, which is likely in a Chinese invasion scenario, the M1A2Ts’ size and weight make them less maneuverable and more vulnerable to ambushes.
Taiwan’s strategic focus should prioritize asymmetric capabilities — mobile anti-ship missiles, fast attack boats, tactical combat and autonomous kamikaze drones and defensive mines — over large and expensive platforms. These systems are better suited to exploit Taiwan’s geographic advantages and counter China’s numerical and technological superiority.
The M1A2T tanks might be a modern touch to Taiwan’s aging tank fleets and symbolize its commitment to strengthening its defense capabilities. However, their long-term value must be assessed within the broader context of Taiwan’s unique challenges and strategic goals. Rather than matching China weapon-for-weapon,
Taiwan’s defense strategy should emphasize agility, cost-efficiency, adaptability and sustainability to ensure it remains prepared for any potential threat.
Harun Talha Ayanoglu is a research associate at the Taiwan Center for Security Studies.
In September 2015, Russia intervened militarily in Syria’s civil war, propping up Bashar al-Assad’s dictatorship as it teetered on the brink of collapse. This was the high point of Russia’s resurgence on the world stage and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ability to tilt the war in al-Assad’s favor helped make him a regional power broker. In addition to enhancing Putin’s stature, the operation led to strategic gains that gave Russia leverage vis-a-vis regional and Western powers. Syria was thus a status symbol for the Kremlin. Putin, who sees Russia as a great power on par with the US and China, attaches
With Washington substantially off-guard in power transition, China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping (習近平), is intensifying an anti-corruption campaign against the top military leadership. At a glance, the move seems to be consistent with his emphasis on the necessity of enhancing military preparedness for a possible full military invasion of Taiwan, because the military is required to be well-disciplined without corruption. Looking carefully, however, a series of purges of several top military leaders since last year begs the question of what dynamics has worked behind the anomaly. More specifically, general Wei Fenghe (魏鳳和) and his immediate successor, Li Shangfu (李尚福), were removed as People’s
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In the weeks following the 2024 US presidential election, I have received one question more than any other from friends in Taiwan — how will Donald J. Trump’s return to the White House affect Taiwan and cross-Strait relations? Some Taiwan counterparts have argued that Trump hates China, so therefore he will support Taiwan, according to the logic that the enemy of one’s enemy is a friend. Others have expressed anxiety that Trump will put pressure on Taiwan to dramatically increase defense spending, or to compensate the United States for allegedly “stealing” America’s semiconductor sector. While I understand these hopes and concerns, I
RSS