The UN agency entrusted with the protection and welfare of Palestine refugees for three-quarters of a century, UNRWA, which I lead, was always meant to be temporary. The conclusion of its mandate was foreseen at its establishment. The choice before us is whether to jettison a decades-long investment in human development and human rights by chaotically dismantling the agency overnight, or pursue an orderly political process in which UNRWA continues to provide millions of Palestine refugees with education and healthcare until empowered Palestinian institutions take over those services.
The agency might be forced to halt its work in the occupied Palestinian territory next month if legislation passed by the Israeli parliament is implemented. The laws would cripple the humanitarian response in Gaza and deprive millions of Palestinian refugees of essential services in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. They would also eliminate a vocal witness to the countless horrors and injustices Palestinians have endured for decades.
The government of Israel’s brazen effort to thwart the will of the international community — expressed through multiple UN resolutions — and single-handedly dismantle a UN agency has been met with public condemnation and outrage that has largely petered out into political inertia.
The dearth of political courage and principled leadership when it matters most does not bode well for our multilateral system.
What is at stake? For Palestinian refugees, it is their very lives and future. The impact of barring access to education, healthcare and other social services would be devastating and multigenerational. Complicity in this endeavor erodes not only our humanity, but also the legitimacy of our multilateral system. The near total absence of political, economic or legal penalties for flagrant violations of the Geneva Conventions, utter disregard for the resolutions of the UN Security Council and General Assembly, and open defiance of the rulings of the International Court of Justice is making a mockery of the rules-based international order.
The war on Gaza and Palestinians is coupled with an extraordinary assault on those who speak or act in defense of human rights, international law and the victims of a barbaric war. Humanitarian workers with decades of service to war-affected populations are suddenly labeled as terrorists or terrorist sympathizers. Critics of Israeli government policies and actions are intimidated and harassed. Inflammatory propaganda sponsored by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs is now splashed on billboards in prime locations in the US and Europe, complemented by Google ads promoting Web sites replete with disinformation. Those are well-funded efforts to distract from the brutality of an unlawful occupation and the international crimes being committed with total impunity under our watch.
The government of Israel and its affiliates justify actions against UNRWA by claiming that the agency is infiltrated by Hamas, even though all allegations for which any evidence has been offered have been thoroughly investigated. Meanwhile, Hamas accuses UNRWA’s leadership of colluding with the Israeli occupation and opposes the agency’s efforts to promote human rights and gender equality. Far from being a party to the conflict, UNRWA is a casualty of this war.
The objective of efforts to malign and eventually dismantle UNRWA is simple — to eliminate the refugee status of Palestinians and shift, unilaterally, the long-established parameters for a political solution to the conflict. The blind pursuit of that goal has overlooked the fact that the refugee status of Palestinians is not tied to UNRWA and is enshrined in a UN General Assembly resolution that predates the creation of the agency.
Today, the international community is at a crossroads. In one direction lies a world where we have reneged on our commitment to provide a political answer to the question of Palestine. It is a dystopian world, where Israel, as the occupying power, is solely responsible for the population in the occupied Palestinian territory, possibly subcontracting the occupation to private actors who are even less answerable to the international community.
In another direction lies a world where the guardrails of the rules-based order hold firm and the Palestinian question is resolved by political means. That is the path being pursued by the global alliance for the implementation of the two-state solution, led by Saudi Arabia, the EU and the Arab League. That effort, which revives the Arab peace initiative, aims to lay down an irreversible pathway toward a two-state solution and to build the capacity of a Palestinian administration that would govern a future state of Palestine, including Gaza.
That is the path UNRWA was created to support. Pending the establishment of a Palestinian state, the agency would be critical for ensuring that children in Gaza are not condemned to live in the rubble, without education and without hope. No other entity except a functioning state can provide education to hundreds of thousands of girls and boys, and primary healthcare for millions of Palestinians. Within the framework of a political solution, UNRWA can progressively conclude its mandate, with its teachers, doctors and nurses becoming the workforce of empowered Palestinian institutions.
We still have a window of opportunity to avert a cataclysmic future where firepower and propaganda construct the global order, determining where and when human rights and the rule of law apply, if at all. The tools and institutions needed to defend and reinforce our multilateral system and the rules-based order exist and are adequate — we need only find the political courage to use them.
Philippe Lazzarini is UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East commissioner-general.
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
A retired elementary-school teacher surnamed Lai (賴) said that, after retiring at the age of 50, he earned a monthly pension of over NT$60,000. Since retirement, he has earned over NT$10 million (US$306,457). If the government does not allocate more funding, the pension funds would soon go bankrupt. There is an urgent need for reform. If his monthly pension were lowered to NT$50,000, it would still be enough to cover basic life expenses, he said. In response, Taipei School Education Union president Lee Hui-lan (李惠蘭) said to Lai: “What do you mean by using your own pension as an example?”
RSS