In the twilight of his political career, US President Joe Biden is disappearing into the background even before US president-elect Donald Trump returns to the White House, despite growing turmoil at home and abroad.
The 82-year-old US president’s silence on a looming government shutdown over Christmas is just the latest example of how critics say the aging leader is in office, but not in power.
Despite still occupying the world’s most powerful pulpit, Biden has remained virtually absent from the public debate about his noisy successor, whom he often used to brand as a threat to democracy.
Illustration: Mountain People
While Biden stays largely off the radar, it is Trump who increasingly calls the shots, whether by carrying out his own shadow foreign policy or by torpedoing a deal to fund the government.
“This is a Biden problem to solve!” Trump said on his TruthSocial network on Friday.
Biden did make a public appearance on Friday at the Children’s National Hospital in Washington, but did not address the shutdown threat — instead playing a game of catch with an energetic toddler.
Under intense questioning on Friday, the White House defended Biden’s silence on the stand-off with Republicans.
“They blew it up, and they need to fix it. This is not for the president to fix,” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters.
It was always going to be a painful exit for Biden, after he was forced to drop out of the election in June following a disastrous debate against Trump.
He handed over the Democratic nomination to US Vice President Kamala Harris yet was widely reported to have believed that he could have succeeded where she failed against the Republican.
The White House insists that Biden is in what White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients called a “sprint to the finish line” to preserve his legacy before the Jan. 20 handover of power. In recent weeks he has unveiled a string of last-gasp efforts to “Trump-proof” policies on everything from student loan forgiveness to the economy.
He gave televised speeches to hail a ceasefire in Lebanon and to claim credit for the fall of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad — while his administration is still pushing for a truce in Gaza.
Yet sometimes his efforts have often underscored how the US’ oldest president is fading away more than going out with a bang.
Biden coughed throughout what was meant to be a showpiece speech to trumpet his economic legacy last week.
He also appeared frail in a trip to the Amazon during which he momentarily looked like he was wandering off into the jungle, and missed a group photo with G20 leaders in Brazil when they refused to wait for him.
In Angola, making a long-promised first trip of his president to sub-Saharan Africa, Biden appeared to be resting his eyes for several periods during a summit.
Moreover, the man who was once one of the most garrulous politicians in Washington has been almost silent in the face of reporters’ questions.
Biden has in particular declined to say whether he still believes Trump remains a threat to democracy, despite repeatedly condemning the Republican during the campaign for his actions during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol.
He has also refused to comment on perhaps his most prominent act since the election defeat, a pardon for his troubled son Hunter Biden on gun and tax charges.
The sense of a Biden fade-out has not been helped by a proliferation of stories in US media about his decline.
The Wall Street Journal reported last week that White House gatekeepers built a wall around a “diminished” Biden during his presidency, keeping meetings short and controlling access.
The White House denied that Biden had declined physically or mentally, it said.
David Karol, who teaches government and politics at the University of Maryland, said that on the shutdown Democrats had “made the political calculation that it is best to leave the spotlight to Trump and [close ally] Elon Musk.”
Trump “really never went away. By contrast, Biden has been the quietest president in decades,” Karol said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS