The KMT’s winter of chaos
As a cold air mass arrived from China during the weekend of the winter solstice, I was originally in high spirits, with a craving for glutinous rice balls (tangyuan, 湯圓). However, my joy was overshadowed by the chaos in the Legislative Yuan, which shrouded me in the winter’s cold and unforgiving atmosphere. I could not help but worry whether Taiwan’s democracy would become damaged beyond repair.
Since the start of the legislative session, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party legislators have leveraged their numerical advantage to blatantly and repeatedly propose outrageous, constitution-damaging bills that undermine our governance. If this lack of restraint continues, the Chinese Communist Party could simply watch the flames from afar and collect the spoils without lifting a finger. Over time, Taiwan risks falling prey to China — the lessons to be drawn from Hong Kong’s experience should not be ignored.
However, to protect their livelihoods, most kind and diligent Taiwanese must live on as usual, working their daily jobs to earn money and bring food to the table. This is understandable — but at the same time, the latest developments in the Legislative Yuan are inextricable from their own self-interest.
All laws written and implemented would eventually affect the people. Erroneous, misguided and even regressive laws would leave generational impacts. It is thanks to the many pioneers that spent their lives fighting for Taiwan’s democracy that our country has come this far today. As the new generation, reaping the benefits of their sacrifices, could we really allow our indifference to destroy Taiwan’s democracy?
In the next election, earnestly and carefully choose candidates whose ideas would lead to national progress and who understand and value democracy and rule of law.
KMT legislators should think of the people they serve and turn back before it is too late. In keeping with the spirit of the winter solstice, here is some food for thought: “A blind person eating tangyuan knows what is inside.”
When it comes to the KMT’s schemes, the public sees the truth in their hearts.
Liu Ping-sheng,
Taipei
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS