The KMT’s winter of chaos
As a cold air mass arrived from China during the weekend of the winter solstice, I was originally in high spirits, with a craving for glutinous rice balls (tangyuan, 湯圓). However, my joy was overshadowed by the chaos in the Legislative Yuan, which shrouded me in the winter’s cold and unforgiving atmosphere. I could not help but worry whether Taiwan’s democracy would become damaged beyond repair.
Since the start of the legislative session, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party legislators have leveraged their numerical advantage to blatantly and repeatedly propose outrageous, constitution-damaging bills that undermine our governance. If this lack of restraint continues, the Chinese Communist Party could simply watch the flames from afar and collect the spoils without lifting a finger. Over time, Taiwan risks falling prey to China — the lessons to be drawn from Hong Kong’s experience should not be ignored.
However, to protect their livelihoods, most kind and diligent Taiwanese must live on as usual, working their daily jobs to earn money and bring food to the table. This is understandable — but at the same time, the latest developments in the Legislative Yuan are inextricable from their own self-interest.
All laws written and implemented would eventually affect the people. Erroneous, misguided and even regressive laws would leave generational impacts. It is thanks to the many pioneers that spent their lives fighting for Taiwan’s democracy that our country has come this far today. As the new generation, reaping the benefits of their sacrifices, could we really allow our indifference to destroy Taiwan’s democracy?
In the next election, earnestly and carefully choose candidates whose ideas would lead to national progress and who understand and value democracy and rule of law.
KMT legislators should think of the people they serve and turn back before it is too late. In keeping with the spirit of the winter solstice, here is some food for thought: “A blind person eating tangyuan knows what is inside.”
When it comes to the KMT’s schemes, the public sees the truth in their hearts.
Liu Ping-sheng,
Taipei
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS