The rise of drones — tactical, maritime and integrated drone missiles — and their application on the battlefield is fundamentally changing the character of warfare. Taiwan must be at the forefront of these shifts to leverage their potential, especially in boosting deterrence in the Taiwan Strait.
Drones are revolutionizing modern warfare, introducing new tactical and strategic dimensions, and providing smaller, less equipped forces with the ability to challenge and overcome larger powers, as seen with Ukraine’s resistance against Russia’s invasion and the ousting of former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad by rebels led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).
In an interview with the Guardian on Friday last week, Abu Hassan al-Hamwi, head of HTS’ military wing and coordinator of the various rebel factions, said that drones and a highly disciplined operation played a key role in overcoming the al-Assad regime’s superior military power.
The rebels used creative methods given their limited resources, such as employing engineers, mechanics and chemists, al-Hamwi said, adding: “We unified their knowledge and set clear objectives. We needed reconnaissance drones, attack drones and suicide drones, with a focus on range and endurance.”
Nowhere has the revolutionary impact of drones been more clearly demonstrated than in Ukraine’s fight against Russia. Ukraine has used huge masses of tactical drones — such as first-person view drones — that have created a partially transparent battlefield. This has boosted battlefield awareness and assisted in attacks against Russia’s high-value military assets, such as tanks and ships.
Most critical is the use of missile drones — cheap, precise and easy to use — providing capabilities previously unattainable for smaller forces. As Jared McKinney and Reiss Oltman wrote in Nikkei Asia in September, Ukraine has managed to sink much of Russia’s vaunted Black Sea Fleet without a navy, instead relying on a “mosquito fleet” of asymmetric weapons, such as anti-ship missiles, uncrewed surface vessels and TB-2 drones.
In a recent Institute for the Study of War report titled “A Defense of Taiwan with Ukrainian Characteristics: Lessons from the war in Ukraine for the Western Pacific,” Riley Bailey and Frederick Kagan wrote that Ukraine’s interdiction of the Russian Black Sea fleet demonstrated “that countries with few or no conventional naval capabilities can inflict defeats on countries with superior navies.”
Taiwan is heeding these lessons, such as with its procurement of Harpoon anti-ship missiles, High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, its indigenously developed Hsiung Feng missile series and the creation of a drone alliance to secure drone supply chains and boost innovation. However, the nation could go further by ramping up funding.
It was reported in the Financial Times last month that government officials were in contact with US president-elect Donald Trump’s team about procuring up to US$15 billion in military hardware, including conventional platforms such as F-35 jets and Ticonderoga-class cruisers.
Possession of such advanced platforms is important, as they enable the nation to defend its territory, especially against the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s “gray zone” activities. They are also a significant morale booster for the military, send Beijing a strong signal of the US’ continued support and increase the public’s confidence in their armed forces.
However, national leaders should ensure they continue to procure the nation’s own asymmetric “mosquito fleet,” particularly drones as well as anti-ship and coastal defense systems. Such weapons would be cost-effective, provide greater tactical flexibility and be harder to detect. Focusing on these asymmetric capabilities would help to level the playing field against a much larger aggressor, as Ukraine and HTS have done.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,