The army’s long-awaited first shipment of 38 of the 108 ordered US-made M1A2T tanks arrived on Sunday last week. The same shipment also included four M88A2 armored recovery vehicles. The M1A2T is not only the most powerful tank available, it is also the first new model procured by our military in more than 30 years. Its maneuverability, firepower and defensive capabilities far outstrip those of the armored units currently in service. In facing the threats posed to Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and its air-cushioned landing crafts, the M1A2T could hold off such forces with its overwhelming superiority.
Naysayers spreading a narrative centered on the “uselessness” of tanks in Taiwan believe that this shipment — and its procurement — is inappropriate for our military. They go as far as to argue that the M1 Abrams family of tanks, including the M1A2T variant, are unsuited to take on the threat of aerial drones on modern battlefields.
Taiwan’s infrastructure and topography as well as the appearance of other modern battlefields suggest otherwise.
Based on recent news stories about the M1A2T’s arrival, none of the asphalt roads sustained damage during transfer and delivery or during autonomous drive tests. Despite the M1A2T weighing about 63 tonnes, Taiwan’s asphalt roads are durable enough to handle the load and the tanks’ continuous track treading. Heavily laden dump trucks and other large trucks transporting gravel and sand frequently travel long distances along Taiwan’s roads, and they seem to have little or no impact. Several of our highways are also capable of bearing the weight, as proven by the newly arrived tanks. The claim that the M1A2T is too heavy to be suitable for the country’s defense is simply untrue.
Second, the coastal plains of Taiwan’s main island might be far smaller than those in the US, Russia and Europe. However, the land armies of other small and compact nations, and those that might have a high degree of mountainous terrain, such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore and Switzerland, all use heavy tanks in their main forces.
Our army has a need for heavy tanks to carry out national territorial defense operations. When combined with round-wheeled armored vehicles and armed helicopters, the M1A2T is not only suitable for Taiwan, but it directly improves and increases the overall level of our army’s defense operations capabilities.
Third, during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, aerial drones and uncrewed vehicles have been capable of striking and destroying tanks, that much is true.
However, that argument is not the same as saying that the role of tanks in modern warfare has completely fallen to the wayside.
On offense and defense, tanks are winning pieces of war equipment. Outfitting our army with Abrams tanks for hypothetically defensive operations could show off its dual offensive and defensive capabilities.
Fourth, as each batch of the army’s M1A2Ts are successively delivered, they would continue to seamlessly improve defensive operations in northern Taiwan. The deployment of the heavy tanks by the army’s 584th Armored Brigade and the 269th Mechanized Infantry Brigade, based near Hukou (湖口) and Yangmei (楊梅) townships respectively, would enhance the 6th Army Corps’ ability to guard the capital, while augmenting northern Taiwan’s comprehensive defense resilience.
Lastly, looking broadly at the proven operational capabilities of tanks from around the world, the performance of the US-made M1 Abrams tank and its variants is generally superior to that of heavy tanks manufactured by Russia or other undemocratic countries.
Ray Song is a doctoral student at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS