A shipment of 38 M1A2T Abrams tanks ordered from the US arrived at the Port of Taipei on Sunday. A second shipment of 42 tanks is scheduled for next year, with another 28 arriving in 2026 — a total of 108.
Their acquisition represents a significant enhancement to the nation’s defense capabilities, not just as a symbol of military might, but as a strategic asset crucial to Taiwan’s security.
With its advanced technology, superior firepower and robust armor, the M1A2 Abrams is a significant improvement on Taiwan’s US-made M60A3 and indigenously developed CM11 tanks, which have been in service for close to 40 years.
It has been said that Taiwan should not procure big, heavy symmetric platforms, such as tanks, but prioritize acquiring asymmetric platforms, such as anti-ship missiles, mobile air defense systems, mines and drones, which are quicker to deploy than traditional military hardware, cost-effective and could be used in ways that leverage Taiwan’s natural geographic advantages, while targeting the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) vulnerabilities.
While that is true, this is a particular case, as tanks are a unique asset. Even under the asymmetric paradigm, they would still be crucial for the nation’s defense. If there is an attempted invasion and some PLA forces successfully land on Taiwan, the M1A2 Abrams would spearhead the counterattack to take back territory.
Indeed, while 10 of the tanks would remain at the army’s Armor Training Command, the rest would be deployed to the 584th Armored Brigade in Hsinchu County’s Hukou Township (湖口) and the 269th Brigade stationed in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口). These brigades would be responsible for anti-landing missions to ensure the safety of the Port of Taipei and Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport, which would be targets for an invading force to establish a lodgement — a fortified area secured by military force — to allow for the continuous landing of troops and material.
The tanks’ operational use would leverage its strong firepower, armor and advanced technology in a swift counterattack aimed at pushing back the invading force, preventing it from establishing a lodgement. This approach is particularly vital during the critical moments when Chinese troops would be most vulnerable, transitioning from air or sea to land.
These mobile defense tactics would also involve the tanks maneuvering to engage any light mechanized units that might accompany the PLA’s amphibious assault.
As Institute for National Defense and Security Research research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said: In the event of a PLA landing operation, Taiwan has five lines of defense. The first is anti-ship missiles, the second is mobile artillery rocket systems, the third is combat helicopters such as the AH-64E Apache attack helicopters and the fourth is coastal defense missiles. The fifth and final line of defense is comprised of tanks and ground forces.
It is also important that the military’s conventional platforms, such as tanks, are up-to-date and high-quality, and that military personnel continue to improve training and tactics. When operated correctly, the M1A2 is an important and useful platform.
However, these tanks are just one part of a bigger picture of ongoing military reforms. The military must continue its push toward an asymmetric defense strategy, which leverages the nation’s strengths, is cost-effective, exposes the PLA’s operational weaknesses, and makes an invasion attempt extremely costly and logistically challenging. This is exactly what Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) — only the nation’s third civilian defense minister — has been tasked to do.
The positive trajectory of the nation’s military reforms enhances national security and stability in the region.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS