In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.”
Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?”
According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning, and later colonized by the Qing Dynasty, means that Taiwan belongs to China. Following that logic, the Netherlands should actually be considered Taiwan’s true “motherland.” After all, it was the first foreign power to colonize Taiwan.
Additionally, Tungning was an entirely independent kingdom, and the Qing Dynasty was not even ruled by Han Chinese — neither regime referred to itself as “China.”
No matter how far the argument is stretched, Taiwan is not — and never has been — a part of the People’s Republic of China.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party are a band of ruffians whose only goal is to gain political power. They have no regard for human rights, freedom or democracy — only autocratic dictatorship.
Who in their right mind would want China to be their “motherland?” Why not ask Singaporeans if they would be willing?
China’s actions have led many people to be ashamed of their Chinese heritage. In Taiwan, only the KMT “yearns” for its “motherland,” China — but ask its members to become citizens of China and they would firmly refuse.
Taiwanese do not want to be ruled by China, yet these pro-China KMT legislators continue with their antics, throwing Taiwan into chaos. Perhaps they are the ones who deserve a “good beating.”
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS