The WHO has said all types of cigarettes, including e-cigarettes, are detrimental to health. Most e-cigarettes contain nicotine and carcinogens, which are harmful for smokers and those who are exposed to second-hand smoke.
There is no evidence that proves e-cigarettes could help smokers quit smoking. There are also safety concerns regarding the use of e-cigarettes.
Most e-cigarettes contain carcinogens and can be used to consume marijuana and drugs such as etomidate. The Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act (菸害防制法), which was promulgated last year, prohibits selling, demonstrating and using e-cigarettes.
Despite the law being in effect for almost two years, e-cigarette smokers can still be seen almost everywhere on the streets. Foreigners can also be seen smoking e-cigarettes outside the airport.
Although a law has been enacted to ban e-cigarettes, it seems that the relevant authorities are not proactive about implementing it.
I was recently at a driving training school to sign up for a course for my son. There, I saw a woman, who was probably in her 30s, smoking an e-cigarette while waiting for her turn to practice driving.
Five or six classmates, who were also waiting for their turn to practice alongside the woman, stood up and stayed away from her. Three coaches, watching her from a distance, discussed with each other, not knowing what to do.
When I saw this, I walked toward her and said loudly: “Miss, smoking e-cigarettes is illegal. The penalty ranges from NT$2,000 to NT$10,000.” Shocked, the woman put away her e-cigarette and apologized to the people surrounding her. The Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act has been in effect for almost two years. Many smokers count on luck and blatantly violate the law just because there has not been enough enforcement of the law.
Local health agencies should expand manpower to enforce the new law. This is necessary to correct bad habits and maintain people’s health.
Chen Hung-hui is a counselor.
Translated by Fion Khan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS