South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, impeached on the second attempt, was always more popular abroad than at home.
Just over a year ago, he was holding hands with then-Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida and US President Joe Biden at a historical trilateral summit at Camp David. A few months before that, Yoon was feted at the White House, serenading Biden with a rendition of Don McLean’s American Pie and crooning about “the day the music died.”
After his botched attempt to declare martial law, few would write wistful ditties about the day his leadership died. However, there is something to regret: With it, the region risks losing an important trilateral relationship at the worst possible time.
Yoon’s bridge-building with Tokyo was politically unwise, but nonetheless the right move. It led to the Camp David meeting and what seemed a new age of ties. Just last month, the three countries formed a permanent secretariat aimed at future-proofing their relationship against changes in leadership. The near-term target was no doubt US president-elect Donald Trump more than Yoon, who still had half his term remaining.
With Yoon now in limbo as South Korea’s Constitutional Court reviews his case following his baffling and brief declaration of martial law, rocky days are ahead for a three-way partnership that is more important than ever in an increasingly unstable region. Isolationist North Korea has exhibited a new fervor for geopolitics, moving closer to Russia economically and militarily, with its dispatch of soldiers to fight in Ukraine. After the unexpected conflicts that have kicked off from Ukraine to Syria, the relative calm at the Demilitarized Zone might just be temporary. China would be seeking levers to exploit the change in US administration and nudge Seoul and Tokyo closer to its orbit.
Next year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the 60th of the normalization of ties between Japan and South Korea. Commemorating those dates with the spirit of Camp David, which hailed “a new era of trilateral partnership,” would have been encouraging.
However, it now seems unlikely. Opposition leader Lee Jae-myung, considered the most likely to replace Yoon, has frequently dipped into the anti-Japan stance of the South Korean left. He has called for more apologies from Tokyo, chastised Yoon’s administration for its “degrading diplomacy” toward its neighbor over the ownership of the messaging app Line and likened Tokyo’s release of water from the damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to a “second Pacific War.”
The first impeachment motion against Yoon went out of its way to criticize his “bizarre Japan-centered foreign policies” and appointment of people “lenient toward Tokyo to key government positions,” while criticizing his anti-Pyongyang stance. The anti-Japan language was removed from the second, successful motion.
It is easy to pin the blame on Yoon and his strange actions this month. However, in truth, he is just the last domino to fall. Biden gave himself far too much credit when he said in July he had restored ties between Japan and South Korea after “essentially having hostilities toward one another since the end of World War II.” The Yoon-Kishida era was indeed a high-water mark, but hardly the only one. The relationship between the two countries has long been a roller coaster akin to the “we are so back/it’s so over” meme.
Biden’s involvement was nonetheless vital to smoothing the relationship that had soured before the COVID-19 pandemic, under former South Korean president Moon Jae-in. Now, Biden himself is a lame duck and his successor an erratic operator. During his first term, Trump considered withdrawing US forces from South Korea, and alternatingly threatened and courted Kim Jong-un.
Meanwhile in Tokyo, in the place of diplomatically savvy former Japanese prime ministers Shinzo Abe and Kishida, there is now Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, leading a minority government that is the weakest in recent memory. While Ishiba does not by himself threaten a radical shift in policy, his inexperience on the world stage raises questions over his diplomatic dexterity. It was on full display at the APEC forum last month, where he made a multitude of faux pas and missed an important photo op.
In a sign of how strained relations were even before Yoon’s martial law declaration, Seoul boycotted a memorial ceremony at the Sado Island Gold Mines, recently declared a World Heritage site, seemingly over a report that Japan’s representative to the event had once visited Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine. In another ironic twist, the report itself turned out to be wrong.
It is also concerning that bilateral relations between Japan and the US, having reached new heights in recent years, suddenly look a little rockier. The US is edging closer to having to, in effect, declare Japan a national security threat in order to reject Nippon Steel’s bid for US Steel. Tokyo is losing its biggest cheerleader on the global stage in Rahm Emanuel, the US ambassador to Tokyo, as he prepares to depart Japan early next year.
Tellingly, Ishiba failed to even secure a meeting with Trump during his recent visit to the Americas. Abe’s widow, Akie, just dined with Trump and his wife, Melania, at Mar-a-Lago, but it is unclear if it is at the government’s behest. (Abe and Ishiba were bitter political rivals.) To top it off, Trump’s likely secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has had choice words on the issue of wartime “comfort women” that would raise eyebrows in Tokyo.
All of which leaves things in East Asia looking rockier than could scarcely have been believed at the start of this year. Yoon, Kishida and Biden, in their Camp David statement, noted that the “opportunity that lies before us was not guaranteed — it was embraced.” Cordial relations between the nations are indeed far from set in stone, regardless of attempts to future-proof them. They require constant work, sacrifice and, indeed, bravery. The three leaders who are to replace Yoon, Kishida and Biden would do well to remember that.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
RSS