South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol, impeached on the second attempt, was always more popular abroad than at home.
Just over a year ago, he was holding hands with then-Japanese prime minister Fumio Kishida and US President Joe Biden at a historical trilateral summit at Camp David. A few months before that, Yoon was feted at the White House, serenading Biden with a rendition of Don McLean’s American Pie and crooning about “the day the music died.”
After his botched attempt to declare martial law, few would write wistful ditties about the day his leadership died. However, there is something to regret: With it, the region risks losing an important trilateral relationship at the worst possible time.
Yoon’s bridge-building with Tokyo was politically unwise, but nonetheless the right move. It led to the Camp David meeting and what seemed a new age of ties. Just last month, the three countries formed a permanent secretariat aimed at future-proofing their relationship against changes in leadership. The near-term target was no doubt US president-elect Donald Trump more than Yoon, who still had half his term remaining.
With Yoon now in limbo as South Korea’s Constitutional Court reviews his case following his baffling and brief declaration of martial law, rocky days are ahead for a three-way partnership that is more important than ever in an increasingly unstable region. Isolationist North Korea has exhibited a new fervor for geopolitics, moving closer to Russia economically and militarily, with its dispatch of soldiers to fight in Ukraine. After the unexpected conflicts that have kicked off from Ukraine to Syria, the relative calm at the Demilitarized Zone might just be temporary. China would be seeking levers to exploit the change in US administration and nudge Seoul and Tokyo closer to its orbit.
Next year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the 60th of the normalization of ties between Japan and South Korea. Commemorating those dates with the spirit of Camp David, which hailed “a new era of trilateral partnership,” would have been encouraging.
However, it now seems unlikely. Opposition leader Lee Jae-myung, considered the most likely to replace Yoon, has frequently dipped into the anti-Japan stance of the South Korean left. He has called for more apologies from Tokyo, chastised Yoon’s administration for its “degrading diplomacy” toward its neighbor over the ownership of the messaging app Line and likened Tokyo’s release of water from the damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to a “second Pacific War.”
The first impeachment motion against Yoon went out of its way to criticize his “bizarre Japan-centered foreign policies” and appointment of people “lenient toward Tokyo to key government positions,” while criticizing his anti-Pyongyang stance. The anti-Japan language was removed from the second, successful motion.
It is easy to pin the blame on Yoon and his strange actions this month. However, in truth, he is just the last domino to fall. Biden gave himself far too much credit when he said in July he had restored ties between Japan and South Korea after “essentially having hostilities toward one another since the end of World War II.” The Yoon-Kishida era was indeed a high-water mark, but hardly the only one. The relationship between the two countries has long been a roller coaster akin to the “we are so back/it’s so over” meme.
Biden’s involvement was nonetheless vital to smoothing the relationship that had soured before the COVID-19 pandemic, under former South Korean president Moon Jae-in. Now, Biden himself is a lame duck and his successor an erratic operator. During his first term, Trump considered withdrawing US forces from South Korea, and alternatingly threatened and courted Kim Jong-un.
Meanwhile in Tokyo, in the place of diplomatically savvy former Japanese prime ministers Shinzo Abe and Kishida, there is now Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, leading a minority government that is the weakest in recent memory. While Ishiba does not by himself threaten a radical shift in policy, his inexperience on the world stage raises questions over his diplomatic dexterity. It was on full display at the APEC forum last month, where he made a multitude of faux pas and missed an important photo op.
In a sign of how strained relations were even before Yoon’s martial law declaration, Seoul boycotted a memorial ceremony at the Sado Island Gold Mines, recently declared a World Heritage site, seemingly over a report that Japan’s representative to the event had once visited Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine. In another ironic twist, the report itself turned out to be wrong.
It is also concerning that bilateral relations between Japan and the US, having reached new heights in recent years, suddenly look a little rockier. The US is edging closer to having to, in effect, declare Japan a national security threat in order to reject Nippon Steel’s bid for US Steel. Tokyo is losing its biggest cheerleader on the global stage in Rahm Emanuel, the US ambassador to Tokyo, as he prepares to depart Japan early next year.
Tellingly, Ishiba failed to even secure a meeting with Trump during his recent visit to the Americas. Abe’s widow, Akie, just dined with Trump and his wife, Melania, at Mar-a-Lago, but it is unclear if it is at the government’s behest. (Abe and Ishiba were bitter political rivals.) To top it off, Trump’s likely secretary of state, Marco Rubio, has had choice words on the issue of wartime “comfort women” that would raise eyebrows in Tokyo.
All of which leaves things in East Asia looking rockier than could scarcely have been believed at the start of this year. Yoon, Kishida and Biden, in their Camp David statement, noted that the “opportunity that lies before us was not guaranteed — it was embraced.” Cordial relations between the nations are indeed far from set in stone, regardless of attempts to future-proof them. They require constant work, sacrifice and, indeed, bravery. The three leaders who are to replace Yoon, Kishida and Biden would do well to remember that.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS