Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) yesterday hosted the 15th Taipei-Shanghai Twin-City Forum in Taipei. The annual event is supposed to facilitate exchanges, understanding and cooperation, and promote peace and goodwill — especially in these particularly tense times.
Life is never that simple, and this is especially true when it comes to cross-strait relations. The forum has never been uncontroversial.
For the expense to Taipei taxpayers’ pockets, many question what real value can be gained from the forum, save for the opportunity for the Taipei mayor to put on a good show on a high-profile platform.
Over the past few years, the incumbent mayor has emphasized the need to reduce cross-strait tensions and said that the forum is the only official-level exchange opportunity between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait since national-level communication channels were cut in 2016.
Chiang yesterday waxed lyrical about his desire for “more dialogue and less confrontation; more of the olive branch of peace, less sour grapes of conflict; and more lights from fishing boats adorning the sunset, less of the howls of ships and fighter jets.”
On the campaign trail in 2022, Chiang laid down conditions for continuing the controversial annual forum, echoing similar conditions stated by his predecessor, former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), promising that he would cancel it unless the Chinese Communist Party (CPP) demonstrated the principles of equality, respect, goodwill and reciprocity in its approach to the forum.
Chiang said that last year too, but the forum goes ahead even though the CCP adheres to none of the aforementioned principles. It is not surprising that a politician would write a check during a campaign, only to bounce that check when in power. More importantly, however reasonable or well-intentioned a line drawn in sand might be, it quickly loses all meaning and power when the other side so gleefully runs roughshod over it. Chiang knows this, as did Ko before him, and yet the show still went on.
It is true that the forum has been the only official exchange between China and Taiwan since 2016. Taipei City Government spokesman Yin Wei (殷瑋) has placed the blame for this squarely at the feet of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). This is a political move, as he and Chiang know that the reason for this disruption of communication was the CCP’s unilateral and immediate decision to sever communications on the election of Tsai, due to her refusal to accept the so-called “1992 consensus” and idea of “one China” as preconditions for talks. They also know that Tsai and President William Lai (賴清德) have offered to resume talks with Beijing in good faith, as long as no preconditions are set.
Blaming the Taiwan side, be it the DPP, Tsai, Lai or all three for the tensions, rather than suggesting that perhaps it is the CCP’s intransigence and bellicosity that should be held accountable for the situation, is not only a distortion of the truth, it is also a lost opportunity for Chiang to stand up during the forum and call the CCP out for its flouting of the principles of respect and goodwill that he himself had once demanded.
Chiang might prefer fishing boat lights prettifying the evening sky over the sound of hostile fighter jets overhead, but he is blaming his own government for the reason they are there, and giving the belligerent a pass, presumably in the hope that the belligerent would not be provoked.
His line drawn in the sand has lost all relevance.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS