As US president-elect Donald Trump steps up his tariff threats against China, Beijing is moving to beat the next US president to the punch with its own restrictions and get Washington to the negotiating table ahead of a full-blown trade war, analysts said.
Armed with the lessons of the last trade war during Trump’s first term, China is seeking to amass bargaining chips to kick off talks with a new US administration on contentious aspects of bilateral ties, including trade and investment, and science and technology. It is also concerned about the harmful effects of additional tariffs on its already-fragile economy.
Last week, China launched a probe into US chip giant Nvidia Corp over what it claimed were suspected antitrust violations, which follows its ban on US-bound exports of rare minerals.
Illustration: Yusha
“We have to look at this as the opening bid in what will likely ultimately turn into a negotiation with the US rather than just an imposition of tariffs and everyone walks away,” HSBC chief Asia economist Fred Neumann said.
China is better prepared to deal with almost any tariffs, short of an “Armageddon announcement” of a 60 percent tariff on all Chinese goods, said George Magnus, research associate at the University of Oxford’s China Centre.
The world’s second-largest economy now globally dominates sectors such as electric vehicles and green energy, and has less need for the Boeing jets and large gasoline-fueled cars it bought back in 2017, having found substitutes such as Airbus airplanes and its own Comac C919.
Nonetheless, China is far from self-sufficient.
A new trade war with the world’s biggest economy would still hurt China more, analysts said, as Washington can levy ever-larger import duties on its goods and further rip China from its supply chains.
China still needs to import strategic materials from the US, such as advanced microchips and other high-tech equipment, and counts on US consumers to buy its goods, given an increasingly pessimistic global trade outlook and weak domestic consumer demand.
Beijing wants to sit down with Trump before he places more curbs on US high-tech exports and to secure the renewal of the US-China Science and Technology Agreement, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for the Asia Pacific at Natixis.
The agreement, which enables scientific collaboration between the two countries, lapsed in August and negotiations over its renewal are unlikely to be completed before Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration.
While China’s Huawei has heavily invested in advanced chipmaking capabilities, their commercial viability remains unclear, she said, incentivizing China’s negotiators to sit down with their US counterparts to strike a deal ensuring a steady supply of US-made chips.
Beijing took two years before it agreed to buy an extra US$200 billion in US goods and services, per the terms of the “Phase One” agreement which ended the first trade war.
This time, China has new carrots to dangle, such as increasing purchases of oil and liquefied natural gas, as the US is currently pumping out more than it can consume.
“Trump bragged on the campaign trail: ‘Drill baby, drill,’ so [he] will need the demand support,” said Bo Zhengyuan, a Shanghai-based partner at consultancy Plenum.
Given the increasing restrictions on the export of chips, agricultural goods, commodities and energy are among the items the US can still sell to China, Bo said.
When asked for comment, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said it was open to engaging and communicating with the economic and trade teams of the Trump administration.
However, Beijing also has sticks to beat Washington with, if the US side feels China’s failure to meet its previous purchase commitments means it would gain more from tariffs than talks.
US firms are already feeling the squeeze, American Chamber of Commerce in China president Michael Hart said.
“US companies and other foreign companies have really been concerned about whether they actually have access to this market,” Hart said. “Can we even sell into China anymore? Is there an outright ban on us?”
Business sentiment among US firms in China is at its lowest since 1999, a September survey by the American Chamber’s Shanghai chapter showed.
There are also non-economic factors at play. Trump has pledged additional tariffs of 10 percent on Chinese goods to push Beijing to do more to stop fentanyl flows into the US.
“Using political justifications for the imposition of trade restrictions ultimately makes the tensions much more intractable,” Neumann said.
The fentanyl tariffs also mirror China’s import curbs on trading partners that displease Beijing over issues such as human rights, Taiwan and the South China Sea.
“It’s taking a leaf out of China’s manual of coercion,” Magnus said. “I think they would see it as a slap in the face.”
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS