Intelligence-sharing networks need reliable and trustworthy partners. Japan is an obvious choice for the Western-dominated “Five Eyes” spy alliance, made up of the US, UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Tokyo’s inclusion in the club is long overdue, especially as the region combats China’s growing assertiveness and the unpredictability of North Korea’s nuclear ambitions.
The group should not waste any more time to take advantage of Tokyo’s expertise. It has one of the world’s biggest intelligence-gathering establishments and has long had eyes on China and North Korea, both considered among the nation’s biggest security threats. That knowledge would prove invaluable for the Washington-led coalition, under pressure from an increasingly hostile environment.
US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s trip to Tokyo last week to strengthen security cooperation is another reminder of that reality. Beijing’s influence is growing, economically and militarily. China last week launched the largest number of its naval vessels around Taiwan since 2022 in yet another attempt to intimidate the self-ruled nation that Beijing claims as its own.
Illustration: Yusha
Meanwhile, Washington’s other Asian allies, South Korea and the Philippines, are increasingly unstable. Seoul is contending with mass protests, the result of South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol’s disastrous decision to temporarily impose martial law on Dec. 3. He is facing an impending impeachment vote, and on Thursday said he would not step down. In Manila, a war is brewing between the archipelago’s two ruling families, the Marcoses and the Dutertes, which could spell more uncertainty ahead.
Japan, even with its own recent political upheaval that saw Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba lose his parliamentary majority, is currently the US’ most reliable Asian partner. Still, for any intelligence sharing to work well, Tokyo would need to address its own security weaknesses, in particular the robustness of its cybersecurity and data systems. The US last year warned Japan that Chinese state hackers had infiltrated its defense networks before Tokyo took sufficient action to secure them.
It is clear that Tokyo’s move in 2013 to pass the country’s first-ever law addressing top-secret material across defense and diplomacy just was not enough to protect national secrets. More work needs to be done. Japan is already ramping up defense spending in recognition of the threats, a move welcomed by its allies. It should also properly invest in strengthening cybersecurity capabilities.
Part of the issue is historical. After World War II, the government hesitated to create an intelligence community, because public opinion was opposed. Tokyo still does not have the equivalent of the CIA or the UK’s MI6, making it difficult for Japan to contribute any human intelligence services — such as spying, reconnaissance and espionage activities — to Five Eyes.
In order for Tokyo to join the grouping, it should understand the standards that all partners meet and develop a separate department in charge of vetting government personnel with access to information that is classified using common standards and procedures, the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies said. That would give staff different levels of clearance, which in turn would limit access to classified information.
Tokyo does manage seven high-performance reconnaissance information-gathering satellites that are extremely advanced and able to identify a human head from outer space. Those have the advantage of being trained on East Asian areas, such as China, North Korea and Russia. That would be a huge advantage for Five Eyes and makes Japan an attractive sixth member.
There is precedence for that. An intelligence leak from 2013 revealed that the alliance had additional intelligence-sharing levels: Nine Eyes and 14 Eyes. Israel, Singapore, Japan and South Korea have all been informal partners within these frameworks. Tokyo’s elevation to the Five Eyes level could boost Asia’s security outlook even further.
The signs are pointing toward an eventual inclusion. In the middle of last month, the alliance reportedly held its first meeting in Japan with senior enlisted personnel of all members. Those efforts should continue, to help pave the way for a complete integration in the future.
Beijing would see including Tokyo in the global spy club as yet another way for the West to try to contain China. However, in a world increasingly lacking in leadership, the intelligence-sharing network could help prevent crises before they begin.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS