US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing.
For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability.
Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and Dollar General, and founded his own trading firm. Most of his work is closely related to supply chain outsourcing to China, so when it comes to China’s product dumping in US markets, Perdue has first-hand experience in dealing with the issue. Trump praised him for serving as a Fortune 500 CEO. The ambassador-to-be also lived in Hong Kong and Singapore, and is relatively acquainted with the way things in Asia operate and on Asian affairs.
From 2015 to 2021, he served in the US Senate and on the Senate’s Military Affairs and Foreign Affairs Committees. He is the only Republican senator to have served on both committees, also chairing the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower. He is also a well-known advocate of Taiwan in the US government, having cosponsored a 2015 bill to support Taiwan’s observer status in Interpol, a 2017 bill for Taiwan to attend the World Health Assembly, and in 2019 called for the National Defense Authorization Act to be amended to include language supportive of Taiwan.
In 2018, he jointly submitted a letter to the media, warning that the US needed a long-term plan to put a stop to Chinese expansion. In September, he once more submitted a letter to the media, warning the US that China harbors ambitions to replace the US as a leading country in the world and has launched a surreptitious quasi-war that drapes over all areas, including in economics, technology, military affairs and culture. He reminded the US that it needs to take in a proper view of reality and plan long-term policies to curb China’s influence, strictly limit US technological exports to China, work more with allied militaries and enhance the US’ technological innovation capabilities.
Trump’s appointment of Perdue sends a clear message. The US’ restrictions on tech exports to China, the near-total enclosure of China alongside Indo-Pacific allies and the selection of this advocate to fight for the US, forcing China to sit down and be on its best behavior, could be the first of Trump’s hard-ball foreign policy acts.
Speaking first and seizing the initiative could force China to accept this lone way forward. If China does not, it could be further hemmed in. Perdue’s mission also shows us that Trump would further support Taiwan’s forging ahead in the international arena. He would no longer allow China to suppress Taiwan.
Even with Trump about a month away from retaking his oath of office, the situation is already helping Taiwan. Nonetheless, if Taiwanese want help, they must first help themselves.
While the US supports Taiwan, there are some Taiwanese who would betray their own country for meager returns, enraptured in fantasies that make them willing to serve as “united front” tools for China and who show far less support for their home compared with Perdue. Such pro-Beijing elements ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Taiwanese must wake up and show indomitable resolve to defend the nation’s sovereignty. Doing so would gain Taiwan the world’s support and respect.
Tommy Lin is chairman of the Formosa Republican Association and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Tim Smith
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS