US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing.
For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability.
Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and Dollar General, and founded his own trading firm. Most of his work is closely related to supply chain outsourcing to China, so when it comes to China’s product dumping in US markets, Perdue has first-hand experience in dealing with the issue. Trump praised him for serving as a Fortune 500 CEO. The ambassador-to-be also lived in Hong Kong and Singapore, and is relatively acquainted with the way things in Asia operate and on Asian affairs.
From 2015 to 2021, he served in the US Senate and on the Senate’s Military Affairs and Foreign Affairs Committees. He is the only Republican senator to have served on both committees, also chairing the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower. He is also a well-known advocate of Taiwan in the US government, having cosponsored a 2015 bill to support Taiwan’s observer status in Interpol, a 2017 bill for Taiwan to attend the World Health Assembly, and in 2019 called for the National Defense Authorization Act to be amended to include language supportive of Taiwan.
In 2018, he jointly submitted a letter to the media, warning that the US needed a long-term plan to put a stop to Chinese expansion. In September, he once more submitted a letter to the media, warning the US that China harbors ambitions to replace the US as a leading country in the world and has launched a surreptitious quasi-war that drapes over all areas, including in economics, technology, military affairs and culture. He reminded the US that it needs to take in a proper view of reality and plan long-term policies to curb China’s influence, strictly limit US technological exports to China, work more with allied militaries and enhance the US’ technological innovation capabilities.
Trump’s appointment of Perdue sends a clear message. The US’ restrictions on tech exports to China, the near-total enclosure of China alongside Indo-Pacific allies and the selection of this advocate to fight for the US, forcing China to sit down and be on its best behavior, could be the first of Trump’s hard-ball foreign policy acts.
Speaking first and seizing the initiative could force China to accept this lone way forward. If China does not, it could be further hemmed in. Perdue’s mission also shows us that Trump would further support Taiwan’s forging ahead in the international arena. He would no longer allow China to suppress Taiwan.
Even with Trump about a month away from retaking his oath of office, the situation is already helping Taiwan. Nonetheless, if Taiwanese want help, they must first help themselves.
While the US supports Taiwan, there are some Taiwanese who would betray their own country for meager returns, enraptured in fantasies that make them willing to serve as “united front” tools for China and who show far less support for their home compared with Perdue. Such pro-Beijing elements ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Taiwanese must wake up and show indomitable resolve to defend the nation’s sovereignty. Doing so would gain Taiwan the world’s support and respect.
Tommy Lin is chairman of the Formosa Republican Association and director of the Taiwan United Nations Alliance.
Translated by Tim Smith
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of