The key to the development of a democratic nation is social justice and fairness.
Once we go off the rails, the meaning of democracy would be lost.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩) and Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) have proposed amendments to the Act Governing Civil Servants’ Retirement, Discharge and Pensions (公務人員退休資遣撫卹法) and the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法).
According to the amendments proposed by the KMT caucus, pensions received by retired civil servants would be adjusted to serving employees’ salaries and a phased-in reduction of the income replacement ratio would be halted.
The proposal came against a background of a rising consumer price index and the pressure brought by inflation. However, this is a universal problem that is also faced by all workers.
If government funds are again to be diverted to finance retirement fund payments for civil servants, labor rights would be compromised.
Would it be fair to their fellow workers?
The way that the pension received by retired civil servants is calculated is already relatively high. There have been cases where the income replacement ratio exceeded 100 percent, which is unreasonable.
The current pension system readjusts the amount retirees get to a reasonable level on an annual basis. If this were to be changed, social justice and fairness would no longer exist.
The KMT has been criticized for taking care of certain groups of people, despite the fact that it could compromise the national interest. We know that government workers are entitled to their rights, but it has gone too far, there should be appropriate adjustments.
If the KMT clings obstinately to this policy, it would be heavily criticized. Moreover, the public would be hostile to retired civil servants who could in return vent their anger at the KMT. If so, the KMT could not expect to have the civil servants’ support during elections.
Reforming the pension system is a matter of enormous importance. We have made huge efforts and used a lot of social resources to bring the system back onto the right track so that social justice and fairness can be upheld.
If the KMT goes off the rails, it would be criticized or even abandoned by the public. It would be the KMT itself that would be blamed.
Li Kuan-long is a university lecturer.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS