The key to the development of a democratic nation is social justice and fairness.
Once we go off the rails, the meaning of democracy would be lost.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩) and Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) have proposed amendments to the Act Governing Civil Servants’ Retirement, Discharge and Pensions (公務人員退休資遣撫卹法) and the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法).
According to the amendments proposed by the KMT caucus, pensions received by retired civil servants would be adjusted to serving employees’ salaries and a phased-in reduction of the income replacement ratio would be halted.
The proposal came against a background of a rising consumer price index and the pressure brought by inflation. However, this is a universal problem that is also faced by all workers.
If government funds are again to be diverted to finance retirement fund payments for civil servants, labor rights would be compromised.
Would it be fair to their fellow workers?
The way that the pension received by retired civil servants is calculated is already relatively high. There have been cases where the income replacement ratio exceeded 100 percent, which is unreasonable.
The current pension system readjusts the amount retirees get to a reasonable level on an annual basis. If this were to be changed, social justice and fairness would no longer exist.
The KMT has been criticized for taking care of certain groups of people, despite the fact that it could compromise the national interest. We know that government workers are entitled to their rights, but it has gone too far, there should be appropriate adjustments.
If the KMT clings obstinately to this policy, it would be heavily criticized. Moreover, the public would be hostile to retired civil servants who could in return vent their anger at the KMT. If so, the KMT could not expect to have the civil servants’ support during elections.
Reforming the pension system is a matter of enormous importance. We have made huge efforts and used a lot of social resources to bring the system back onto the right track so that social justice and fairness can be upheld.
If the KMT goes off the rails, it would be criticized or even abandoned by the public. It would be the KMT itself that would be blamed.
Li Kuan-long is a university lecturer.
Translated by Fion Khan
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS