The key to the development of a democratic nation is social justice and fairness.
Once we go off the rails, the meaning of democracy would be lost.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩) and Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲) have proposed amendments to the Act Governing Civil Servants’ Retirement, Discharge and Pensions (公務人員退休資遣撫卹法) and the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法).
According to the amendments proposed by the KMT caucus, pensions received by retired civil servants would be adjusted to serving employees’ salaries and a phased-in reduction of the income replacement ratio would be halted.
The proposal came against a background of a rising consumer price index and the pressure brought by inflation. However, this is a universal problem that is also faced by all workers.
If government funds are again to be diverted to finance retirement fund payments for civil servants, labor rights would be compromised.
Would it be fair to their fellow workers?
The way that the pension received by retired civil servants is calculated is already relatively high. There have been cases where the income replacement ratio exceeded 100 percent, which is unreasonable.
The current pension system readjusts the amount retirees get to a reasonable level on an annual basis. If this were to be changed, social justice and fairness would no longer exist.
The KMT has been criticized for taking care of certain groups of people, despite the fact that it could compromise the national interest. We know that government workers are entitled to their rights, but it has gone too far, there should be appropriate adjustments.
If the KMT clings obstinately to this policy, it would be heavily criticized. Moreover, the public would be hostile to retired civil servants who could in return vent their anger at the KMT. If so, the KMT could not expect to have the civil servants’ support during elections.
Reforming the pension system is a matter of enormous importance. We have made huge efforts and used a lot of social resources to bring the system back onto the right track so that social justice and fairness can be upheld.
If the KMT goes off the rails, it would be criticized or even abandoned by the public. It would be the KMT itself that would be blamed.
Li Kuan-long is a university lecturer.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS