On Nov. 9, Indonesia and China released a joint statement on advancing their strategic partnership during Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s visit to China. Both countries agreed to cooperate to become leaders of the global south.
In the document, China and Indonesia present themselves as “major developing countries and significant players” in the global south, signaling their aim to lead and offer an alternative to the global system. They uphold China’s Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and the Bandung Spirit as vital norms for international relations, emphasizing sovereignty, non-intervention, equality, mutual benefit and peaceful coexistence — values that align with the aspirations of many in the global south.
Indonesia’s aspiration to lead the global south has deep roots, illustrated by the Asia-Africa Conference in 1955 and first Indonesian president Sukarno’s New Emerging Forces policy in the 1960s. In Southeast Asia, it positions itself as the leader of ASEAN. This enduring ambition is evident in the Indonesia-China joint statement.
Indonesia’s domestic obstacles challenge Jakarta and Beijing’s cooperation in fulfilling this ambition. Its experiences of being colonized by external powers have made Indonesia forever suspicious toward foreign powers, making it keep its distance from them. This is expressed in Indonesia’s foreign policy principle of bebas dan aktif (free and active), which obliges it to maintain its autonomy. Consequently, sovereignty and non-intervention become the basic norms of Indonesia’s foreign policy. This is the reason behind Indonesia’s ambiguity.
Indonesian elites see China’s rise as an opportunity that could balance US dominance in global politics. However, they also view China as a long-term threat, identifying it as the primary external challenge that must be managed. There are fears that China could threaten Indonesia’s autonomy.
This year’s State of Southeast Asia report by the Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore shows that opinions remain unchanged: 43 percent of Indonesian elites welcome China’s increasing political and strategic influence in the country, while 57 percent express concerns about this influence. Indonesia recognizes the need to balance its relations with China by fostering cooperation with the US to help mitigate China’s influence. Indonesia agreed to receive US$3 million from the US to fund a maritime training center in Batam.
Indonesia uses its relationship with China to limit US influence in the country, because it is also concerned about Washington. The Yusof Ishak Institute survey demonstrates that 72.6 percent of Indonesian elites are worried about the US’ influence in Indonesia. Indonesia strengthened economic cooperation with China by joining its Belt and Road Initiatives and the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. This hedging strategy allows Indonesia to maintain a distance from any foreign power.
This cautious foreign policy aims to maintain Indonesia’s autonomy and overcome its suspicions toward foreign powers. Hence, it is not easy for the nation to build strong bilateral cooperation with other countries to reach a common goal, such as cooperating with China to become leaders of the global south. Additionally, Prabowo has reiterated Indonesia’s commitment to its bebas dan aktif stance during his visit to Beijing last month. Considering this, influential Indonesian leaders have encouraged him to leverage this foreign policy approach throughout his presidency.
Wendy A. Prajuli is a doctoral student at the Institut fur Asien- und Afrikawissenschaften at the Humboldt University of Berlin. Sukmawani Bela Pertiwi is a lecturer in the Department of International Relations at Binus University in Indonesia.
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS