On May 27, 2022, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — still a mayoral candidate at the time — suggested three prerequisites for the continuation of the Shanghai-Taipei Twin City Forum: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could no longer harass Taiwan, must show goodwill toward the nation, and must acknowledge that Taiwan and China are equals.
Just two-and-a-half years later, these commitments have been abandoned completely. This has led to a loss of trust in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) principles and ability to handle cross-strait relations.
The first prerequisite, that the CCP can no longer harass Taiwan, was broken at the very start. Not only have the CCP’s constant military drills failed to cease or even diminish, but now even government vessels, China Coast Guard ships and surveillance balloons have been deployed. China has also surrounded Taiwan in a posture indicating that military exercises are imminent. Even while the KMT and Chiang bury their heads in the sand, ignoring the CCP’s aggression, they cannot hide the reality that the rest of the international community is watching carefully, warning China not to take advantage of the situation or cause trouble.
The second prerequisite of showing goodwill toward Taiwan has also completely failed. Prior to the forum, there have been issues with a Chinese university group invited by the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation and the Cross-Strait CEO Summit. The former used demeaning and offensive language — such as referring to Taiwan’s baseball team as “China, Taipei” and a visit to Taipei Municipal Zhongshan Girls’ High School being headlined as “a monk entering the den of spider demons” — during their trip in Taiwan. The latter openly encouraged Taiwanese businesses to “acknowledge the one China principle and oppose Taiwanese independence” while subtly encouraging Taiwan to “join the red supply chain.” Furthermore, from APEC to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and from Paraguay to Lithuania, China’s continued suppression of Taiwan’s diplomacy has sparked international outrage. Just how far are Chiang and the KMT willing to take their “genius” interpretations of China’s malice as “goodwill”?
The third prerequisite has been reduced to nothing more than a joke. Shanghai’s other international “sister cities,” such as New York, Marseille, Barcelona and Istanbul, always possess a “mayor-to-mayor” relationship. However, the Chiang administration’s six months of groveling to China only resulted in a visit from Shanghai Vice Mayor Hua Yuan (華源) — the youngest in the city’s history. Chiang even insists on personally greeting Hua upon his arrival.
According to media reports, the Taipei City Government also requested that China refrain from sending out People’s Liberation Army aircraft or vessels during the forum, which Beijing refused.
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office also said that referring to Taiwan’s baseball team as the “China, Taipei” team was completely fine.
There is no end to China’s belittling — it lacks even a semblance of equality. Chiang, of all people, should speak up in protest of this — so why has he suddenly gone silent?
Just one forum is enough to expose the hypocrisy and fragility of the KMT’s so-called cross-strait prerequisites of “equality, goodwill and reciprocity.” In the face of the CCP’s uninterrupted military harassment of Taiwan and Shanghai’s condescension toward Chiang, Taiwanese have seen for themselves the KMT’s pitiful obsequiousness. As China continues to exploit, humiliate and repeatedly slap the KMT’s face, party intellectuals such as Chiang and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have simply turned their heads to allow the CCP to hit the other side. If this goes on, Taiwan would never gain respect from China or achieve true peace — instead, the KMT would continue to bring shame upon itself and the country.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS