Taiwan is unparalleled in semiconductor manufacturing, and the country’s major chipmakers are among the most sought-after investors in the latest global trend of building local chip supply chains amid escalating US-China trade frictions and geopolitical risks. However, Taiwan has long lagged rivals in developing chip manufacturing equipment in a market dominated by US, European and Japanese companies.
Taiwan is the world’s largest supplier of foundry services with a market share of more than 75 percent and also the No. 1 supplier of chip packaging and testing services.
However, the nation’s chip companies source most manufacturing tools from foreign semiconductor equipment suppliers such as Applied Materials Inc, ASML Holding NV and Tokyo Electron Ltd.
Only 1 percent of front-end chip manufacturing equipment used by local chipmakers is made by Taiwanese companies despite the government’s decade-long push to build a semiconductor manufacturing equipment supply chain.
It is understandable that semiconductor firms are reluctant to take risks and adopt locally developed equipment, as any delay in rolling out next-generation technology is a matter of life or death for them.
In addition, lukewarm government support has had an effect on the slow uptake of Taiwan-made components. Some analysts believe that it would take 30 years for local semiconductor equipment makers to catch up with their Japanese rivals.
With Taiwan ascending to center stage in the semiconductor industry over the past few years and playing a key role in enabling artificial intelligence (AI) applications worldwide, there would never be an optimal time for the nation to strengthen its semiconductor equipment supply chain.
However, it is already happening to the nation’s chip packaging segment. That Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is racing to produce AI chips to catch up with rapidly growing demand helps boost demand for locally made equipment for chip-on-wafer-on-silicon (CoWoS) packaging technology. The adoption rate of locally made chip packaging tools has increased to 15 percent.
CoWoS equipment suppliers from All Ring Technology Co and Grand Process Technology Corp to Gallant Micro Machining Co are enjoying strong revenue growth. All Ring’s profits ballooned to NT$895 million (US$27.6 million) in the first three quarters of this year from NT$72 million in the same period last year. Earnings per share skyrocketed to NT$10.3 from NT$0.9.
However, only a few local firms can enjoy the growth of chip manufacturing business, given most local companies are small and have meager financial resources for research and development (R&D).
To address those problems, the Taiwan Electronic Equipment Industry Association on Friday last week urged the government to provide more assistance. The government’s latest tax incentives are appealing to large-scale companies with a high threshold of NT$6 billion in R&D investment. The association said the government should relax restrictions on tax incentives for R&D investment and push for more collaboration with research institutions.
It also called on the government to help small and medium-sized businesses gain better access to overseas markets.
The semiconductor equipment industry has a good business outlook, as about half of the nation’s electronic equipment production would come from such tools by 2028, up from 34 percent this year, the association said.
The adoption rate of locally developed tools has moved at a snail’s pace over the past 10 years. Therefore, the government should consider taking the association’s advice and better support local suppliers to grasp business opportunities stemming from emerging technologies such as AI.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,