The Dalai Lama, a symbol of peace and spiritual leadership, has been a beacon of hope for millions around the world. His teachings transcend borders, promoting compassion, non-violence and understanding. As the Dalai Lama ages, the question of his reincarnation becomes increasingly pertinent. It is crucial for India, which has historically provided refuge to the Dalai Lama and his followers, to respect and support his right to choose his place of rebirth, even if it is outside the confines of China.
The Dalai Lama’s lineage is deeply rooted in Tibetan Buddhism, where the process of reincarnation is a fundamental belief. The selection of the next Dalai Lama is not just a political decision, but a spiritual one, guided by centuries-old traditions.
Historically, the Dalai Lama has been a unifying figure for Tibetans, embodying their cultural and religious identity. The Chinese government’s attempts to control the reincarnation process are seen by many as an effort to undermine Tibetan autonomy and spiritual freedom.
India has been a sanctuary for the Dalai Lama since 1959, when he fled Tibet following a failed uprising against Chinese rule.
That was not just a political gesture, but a commitment to uphold human rights and religious freedom. By supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside China, India would reaffirm its dedication to those principles. It would also send a powerful message about the importance of spiritual autonomy and the right to self-determination.
Supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth could have significant geopolitical implications. It would likely strain India’s already complex relationship with China. However, it is essential to weigh those potential diplomatic tensions against the ethical and moral considerations. Upholding the Dalai Lama’s spiritual rights aligns with India’s democratic values and its long-standing tradition of religious tolerance.
India’s support for the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside communist China is not just about respecting an individual’s spiritual journey. It is about standing up for the principles of freedom, human rights and cultural preservation.
We must advocate for a world where spiritual leaders can practice their beliefs without fear of political interference. India’s leadership in this matter could inspire other nations to take a stand, fostering a global environment of respect and understanding.
Respecting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth is a testament to India’s commitment to human rights and spiritual freedom. It would continue India’s legacy of compassion and support for those who seek refuge from oppression. By doing so, India would not only honor the Dalai Lama’s spiritual journey, but also uphold the values that define its identity.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS