The Dalai Lama, a symbol of peace and spiritual leadership, has been a beacon of hope for millions around the world. His teachings transcend borders, promoting compassion, non-violence and understanding. As the Dalai Lama ages, the question of his reincarnation becomes increasingly pertinent. It is crucial for India, which has historically provided refuge to the Dalai Lama and his followers, to respect and support his right to choose his place of rebirth, even if it is outside the confines of China.
The Dalai Lama’s lineage is deeply rooted in Tibetan Buddhism, where the process of reincarnation is a fundamental belief. The selection of the next Dalai Lama is not just a political decision, but a spiritual one, guided by centuries-old traditions.
Historically, the Dalai Lama has been a unifying figure for Tibetans, embodying their cultural and religious identity. The Chinese government’s attempts to control the reincarnation process are seen by many as an effort to undermine Tibetan autonomy and spiritual freedom.
India has been a sanctuary for the Dalai Lama since 1959, when he fled Tibet following a failed uprising against Chinese rule.
That was not just a political gesture, but a commitment to uphold human rights and religious freedom. By supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside China, India would reaffirm its dedication to those principles. It would also send a powerful message about the importance of spiritual autonomy and the right to self-determination.
Supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth could have significant geopolitical implications. It would likely strain India’s already complex relationship with China. However, it is essential to weigh those potential diplomatic tensions against the ethical and moral considerations. Upholding the Dalai Lama’s spiritual rights aligns with India’s democratic values and its long-standing tradition of religious tolerance.
India’s support for the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside communist China is not just about respecting an individual’s spiritual journey. It is about standing up for the principles of freedom, human rights and cultural preservation.
We must advocate for a world where spiritual leaders can practice their beliefs without fear of political interference. India’s leadership in this matter could inspire other nations to take a stand, fostering a global environment of respect and understanding.
Respecting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth is a testament to India’s commitment to human rights and spiritual freedom. It would continue India’s legacy of compassion and support for those who seek refuge from oppression. By doing so, India would not only honor the Dalai Lama’s spiritual journey, but also uphold the values that define its identity.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
RSS