The Dalai Lama, a symbol of peace and spiritual leadership, has been a beacon of hope for millions around the world. His teachings transcend borders, promoting compassion, non-violence and understanding. As the Dalai Lama ages, the question of his reincarnation becomes increasingly pertinent. It is crucial for India, which has historically provided refuge to the Dalai Lama and his followers, to respect and support his right to choose his place of rebirth, even if it is outside the confines of China.
The Dalai Lama’s lineage is deeply rooted in Tibetan Buddhism, where the process of reincarnation is a fundamental belief. The selection of the next Dalai Lama is not just a political decision, but a spiritual one, guided by centuries-old traditions.
Historically, the Dalai Lama has been a unifying figure for Tibetans, embodying their cultural and religious identity. The Chinese government’s attempts to control the reincarnation process are seen by many as an effort to undermine Tibetan autonomy and spiritual freedom.
India has been a sanctuary for the Dalai Lama since 1959, when he fled Tibet following a failed uprising against Chinese rule.
That was not just a political gesture, but a commitment to uphold human rights and religious freedom. By supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside China, India would reaffirm its dedication to those principles. It would also send a powerful message about the importance of spiritual autonomy and the right to self-determination.
Supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth could have significant geopolitical implications. It would likely strain India’s already complex relationship with China. However, it is essential to weigh those potential diplomatic tensions against the ethical and moral considerations. Upholding the Dalai Lama’s spiritual rights aligns with India’s democratic values and its long-standing tradition of religious tolerance.
India’s support for the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside communist China is not just about respecting an individual’s spiritual journey. It is about standing up for the principles of freedom, human rights and cultural preservation.
We must advocate for a world where spiritual leaders can practice their beliefs without fear of political interference. India’s leadership in this matter could inspire other nations to take a stand, fostering a global environment of respect and understanding.
Respecting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth is a testament to India’s commitment to human rights and spiritual freedom. It would continue India’s legacy of compassion and support for those who seek refuge from oppression. By doing so, India would not only honor the Dalai Lama’s spiritual journey, but also uphold the values that define its identity.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS