The Dalai Lama, a symbol of peace and spiritual leadership, has been a beacon of hope for millions around the world. His teachings transcend borders, promoting compassion, non-violence and understanding. As the Dalai Lama ages, the question of his reincarnation becomes increasingly pertinent. It is crucial for India, which has historically provided refuge to the Dalai Lama and his followers, to respect and support his right to choose his place of rebirth, even if it is outside the confines of China.
The Dalai Lama’s lineage is deeply rooted in Tibetan Buddhism, where the process of reincarnation is a fundamental belief. The selection of the next Dalai Lama is not just a political decision, but a spiritual one, guided by centuries-old traditions.
Historically, the Dalai Lama has been a unifying figure for Tibetans, embodying their cultural and religious identity. The Chinese government’s attempts to control the reincarnation process are seen by many as an effort to undermine Tibetan autonomy and spiritual freedom.
India has been a sanctuary for the Dalai Lama since 1959, when he fled Tibet following a failed uprising against Chinese rule.
That was not just a political gesture, but a commitment to uphold human rights and religious freedom. By supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside China, India would reaffirm its dedication to those principles. It would also send a powerful message about the importance of spiritual autonomy and the right to self-determination.
Supporting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth could have significant geopolitical implications. It would likely strain India’s already complex relationship with China. However, it is essential to weigh those potential diplomatic tensions against the ethical and moral considerations. Upholding the Dalai Lama’s spiritual rights aligns with India’s democratic values and its long-standing tradition of religious tolerance.
India’s support for the Dalai Lama’s right to be reborn outside communist China is not just about respecting an individual’s spiritual journey. It is about standing up for the principles of freedom, human rights and cultural preservation.
We must advocate for a world where spiritual leaders can practice their beliefs without fear of political interference. India’s leadership in this matter could inspire other nations to take a stand, fostering a global environment of respect and understanding.
Respecting the Dalai Lama’s right to choose his place of rebirth is a testament to India’s commitment to human rights and spiritual freedom. It would continue India’s legacy of compassion and support for those who seek refuge from oppression. By doing so, India would not only honor the Dalai Lama’s spiritual journey, but also uphold the values that define its identity.
Khedroob Thondup is a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS