Today is the anniversary of the adoption of the UN Genocide Convention. Seventy-six years later, we are witnessing a genocide in our times.
In the 1940s, Polish Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin coined the word “genocide” to serve as an emergency alarm to mobilize the world to prevent an irrevocable loss to humanity. Lemkin, a Holocaust survivor, advocated for the Genocide Convention.
Last week, Amnesty International released a report concluding that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. It examined more than 200 interviews with people on the ground, photographic and satellite imagery, 100 statements by Israeli authorities, and verified reports. It reviewed jurisprudence from international courts and consulted international law experts.
Intent to destroy a distinct group of people is the hardest requirement in the Genocide Convention to prove. Amnesty determined Israel met this criteria in statements by state officials and its conduct over decades.
Direct statements by Israeli officials have called for indiscriminate attacks, the annihilation of the Gaza Strip, denial of humanitarian aid, forcible transfers of civilians and Israeli settlement expansion into Gaza.
Patterns of conduct show an unprecedented scale and speed in the killing of civilians and the destruction of civilian infrastructure. Explosives that impact wide areas have been dropped on densely populated neighborhoods, hardly a precise targeting of Hamas militants. Amnesty examined 15 airstrikes, a fraction of the attacks, and found no legitimate military targets. Cultural property and agricultural land have been destroyed. Evidence of an unlivable, razed urban landscape is plain to see in aerial and satellite imagery. These actions against non-military targets show acts of genocide.
Amnesty’s report is not slander against Israel. It is a measured analysis and critique of a state’s policies and actions. It is a call for Israel to be treated as the recognized state that it is in the international community. Even a state built on past traumas, which has also experienced recent trauma, has no excuse to inflict further crimes against humanity.
Israel wants people to focus on its right to self-defense. Amnesty has condemned the killing of civilians in southern Israel on Oct. 7 last year and the taking of hostages as war crimes and violations of international law. What is missing, though, is context. Israel has unlawfully occupied the Palestinian Territories for 57 years, illegally blockaded Gaza for 17 years and has maintained an apartheid system. Israel’s impunity and dehumanization of the Palestinians have paved the path to genocide.
Nations are obligated to respond to the alarm of genocide. No country has failed more grandly than my own, the US. Rather than stopping the inhumanity, it has provided a stream of weapons and diplomatic cover. Americans must push Washington to change course.
Taiwan must also play a part, even as a non-member of the UN. Taiwan is engaged with many global issues. However, rather than express concern for the decimation of Gaza to its Israeli counterparts, Taiwanese officials have kept quiet and have deepened ties. This year, Taiwan signed technology, trade and cultural agreements with Israel while echoing Israel’s messages that it is the leader of freedom and democracy in its region. Would Taiwan look back with regret that it failed to join the global outcry to stop a genocide? It is not too late to live up to its image as a country that speaks up for human rights.
Read Amnesty’s report on amnesty.org, sign the petition and ask your government representatives to speak up. Lemkin’s alarm has been sounded. It is our duty to heed this historic call.
Laura Moye is a volunteer Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories coordinator of Amnesty International Taiwan based in Taichung.
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question:
RSS