A case involving a sixth-grade student in Taichung — who allegedly hit a teacher with a tee-ball bat — has stirred up heated public debate in the past week.
The teacher reported the incident to the police after the student refused to apologize the next day, and the student was taken to the local precinct by two police officers.
The case gained public attention after Taichung City Councilor Lee Chung (李中) on Monday last week said he received a complaint by the student’s parents and questioned the school’s handling of the case.
Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) criticized the teacher, calling them “unsuitable to be a teacher,” saying that the child had apologized but the teacher refused to let it go.
She also called the school principal an “incompetent leader” ignorant of the law for letting the police officers take the child without a warrant.
The education department must “severely punish” the teacher and the principal, she said.
Teachers, some parents and people who disagreed with her criticized the mayor’s remarks. Lu’s Facebook page received many comments, accusing her of bullying the teacher.
The city’s police department reprimanded the two police officers who took the child from school without the consent of a legal guardian.
Lu the next day apologized, saying that she had been “too quick to comment,” and that she would ask the city’s education department to establish standard operating procedures regarding such issues.
Over the next few days, local media reported that on March 26 the student allegedly hit the teacher with the bat during an argument in physical education class, and the teacher took him to the counselor’s office and informed his parents.
On Mar. 27, the teacher called the police after the student refused to apologize, but the student apologized upon the police officers’ arrival and the teacher agreed not to file a complaint for bodily harm offenses, reports said.
However, the officers said they are required to complete legal procedures, and took the teacher and child to the police station to take their statements.
The child’s parents in June reported the incident to the city’s education department, while a settlement was reached in a juvenile court session on June 21, and the case was dismissed.
However, the parents in July petitioned the school to investigate the teacher for “improper discipline” and later took the case to the city councilor.
The incident showed that all people involved were unfamiliar with the Juvenile Justice Act (少年事件處理法).
As laws were revised to better protect minors’ rights, including limiting teachers’ discipline methods and allowing parents to report teachers for investigation, many teachers have expressed frustration.
According to the Student Guidance and Counseling Act (學生輔導法), schools are required to provide three levels of guidance and counseling — developmental guidance to all students, intervention counseling by counseling teachers and remedial counseling by professional counselors for those with special needs.
Taking legal action against a student should be a last resort unless immediate danger is involved, but growing distrust between parents and teachers causes a lack of communication. The government would only cause more harm by blaming teachers and denying their rights.
The Taichung City Government should instead investigate whether schools have sufficient counseling resources so that teachers feel supported when dealing with special cases.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS