There have been a series of allegations of workplace bullying after the apparent suicide of a civil servant at the Ministry of Labor’s Workforce Development Agency’s northern branch was alleged to be related to workplace bullying and harassment by the branch director.
These allegations have emerged in a way that is similar to the #MeToo movement. The prevalence of workplace bullying could be attributed to bureaucracy, heavy workload, immense work pressure, poor emotional control, an inability to mentally adapt to the work environment and an intolerance to setbacks.
However, what needs to be reviewed are the management’s mentality and what they choose to do with their power.
Miles’ Law says: “Where you stand depends on where you sit.” To express this in positive terms, one should have a new way of thinking that embraces responsibility and focuses on achieving goals. To put it in a negative way, as one’s duty, position and level change, one has to have a new image, a new attitude and a new style to show off one’s authority.
To be a good official or an oppressive one depends on one’s objective — whether it is for the public interest or personal benefit.
The oppressed becoming the oppressor is what usually happens after one gets promoted. They would use the same tactics used by their former superiors against their new staff.
People with creative ideas can be demanding, and make their staff work as if they are fighting a war. Some make themselves at home when they are in the office. They do as they please, as if they are the “master” or the “boss.”
Employees dare not voice their anger and grievances. Instead, they tolerate it because they are afraid of losing their job.
Supervisors who are eager for promotion would refurbish their office with the advice of a feng shui master. They would get a bigger office, while their staff would be crowded together. Some senior managers like to be escorted and look powerful. Some treat their subordinates like elementary-school students by organizing recreational activities and competitions. These all demonstrate the ugly and petty side of bureaucracy.
Administrative management is about leadership. It emphasizes the culture of an organization and the atmosphere of the office. Smart supervisors should play the role of mentors who encourage their subordinates to voluntarily make an effort, instead of treating them like worker bees and themselves as the queen bees.
Fondness for the grandiose and pragmatism are two totally different administration dimensions. Whether one chooses to bully others for pleasure or use their power to help others is the benchmark for determining one’s moral integrity.
Workplace bullying usually stems from a manager’s bureaucratic mentality and eagerness for power.
Leading with heart, winning people over with virtue and treating coworkers like family are key to uniting a team and encouraging them to work together toward a common goal.
On the contrary, being condescending and arrogant, throwing documents and yelling at staff — all while claiming one’s actions as having a “kind and good purpose” — is harmful to subordinates’ dignity and the unity of a team.
Officials who bully their subordinates are as hated as corrupt officials, because they are the ones who abuse their power.
No one remains an official for their whole life. We are human beings after all. We should put ourselves in someone else’s shoes. Would anyone want to be treated like this?
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS