There have been a series of allegations of workplace bullying after the apparent suicide of a civil servant at the Ministry of Labor’s Workforce Development Agency’s northern branch was alleged to be related to workplace bullying and harassment by the branch director.
These allegations have emerged in a way that is similar to the #MeToo movement. The prevalence of workplace bullying could be attributed to bureaucracy, heavy workload, immense work pressure, poor emotional control, an inability to mentally adapt to the work environment and an intolerance to setbacks.
However, what needs to be reviewed are the management’s mentality and what they choose to do with their power.
Miles’ Law says: “Where you stand depends on where you sit.” To express this in positive terms, one should have a new way of thinking that embraces responsibility and focuses on achieving goals. To put it in a negative way, as one’s duty, position and level change, one has to have a new image, a new attitude and a new style to show off one’s authority.
To be a good official or an oppressive one depends on one’s objective — whether it is for the public interest or personal benefit.
The oppressed becoming the oppressor is what usually happens after one gets promoted. They would use the same tactics used by their former superiors against their new staff.
People with creative ideas can be demanding, and make their staff work as if they are fighting a war. Some make themselves at home when they are in the office. They do as they please, as if they are the “master” or the “boss.”
Employees dare not voice their anger and grievances. Instead, they tolerate it because they are afraid of losing their job.
Supervisors who are eager for promotion would refurbish their office with the advice of a feng shui master. They would get a bigger office, while their staff would be crowded together. Some senior managers like to be escorted and look powerful. Some treat their subordinates like elementary-school students by organizing recreational activities and competitions. These all demonstrate the ugly and petty side of bureaucracy.
Administrative management is about leadership. It emphasizes the culture of an organization and the atmosphere of the office. Smart supervisors should play the role of mentors who encourage their subordinates to voluntarily make an effort, instead of treating them like worker bees and themselves as the queen bees.
Fondness for the grandiose and pragmatism are two totally different administration dimensions. Whether one chooses to bully others for pleasure or use their power to help others is the benchmark for determining one’s moral integrity.
Workplace bullying usually stems from a manager’s bureaucratic mentality and eagerness for power.
Leading with heart, winning people over with virtue and treating coworkers like family are key to uniting a team and encouraging them to work together toward a common goal.
On the contrary, being condescending and arrogant, throwing documents and yelling at staff — all while claiming one’s actions as having a “kind and good purpose” — is harmful to subordinates’ dignity and the unity of a team.
Officials who bully their subordinates are as hated as corrupt officials, because they are the ones who abuse their power.
No one remains an official for their whole life. We are human beings after all. We should put ourselves in someone else’s shoes. Would anyone want to be treated like this?
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS