There have been a series of allegations of workplace bullying after the apparent suicide of a civil servant at the Ministry of Labor’s Workforce Development Agency’s northern branch was alleged to be related to workplace bullying and harassment by the branch director.
These allegations have emerged in a way that is similar to the #MeToo movement. The prevalence of workplace bullying could be attributed to bureaucracy, heavy workload, immense work pressure, poor emotional control, an inability to mentally adapt to the work environment and an intolerance to setbacks.
However, what needs to be reviewed are the management’s mentality and what they choose to do with their power.
Miles’ Law says: “Where you stand depends on where you sit.” To express this in positive terms, one should have a new way of thinking that embraces responsibility and focuses on achieving goals. To put it in a negative way, as one’s duty, position and level change, one has to have a new image, a new attitude and a new style to show off one’s authority.
To be a good official or an oppressive one depends on one’s objective — whether it is for the public interest or personal benefit.
The oppressed becoming the oppressor is what usually happens after one gets promoted. They would use the same tactics used by their former superiors against their new staff.
People with creative ideas can be demanding, and make their staff work as if they are fighting a war. Some make themselves at home when they are in the office. They do as they please, as if they are the “master” or the “boss.”
Employees dare not voice their anger and grievances. Instead, they tolerate it because they are afraid of losing their job.
Supervisors who are eager for promotion would refurbish their office with the advice of a feng shui master. They would get a bigger office, while their staff would be crowded together. Some senior managers like to be escorted and look powerful. Some treat their subordinates like elementary-school students by organizing recreational activities and competitions. These all demonstrate the ugly and petty side of bureaucracy.
Administrative management is about leadership. It emphasizes the culture of an organization and the atmosphere of the office. Smart supervisors should play the role of mentors who encourage their subordinates to voluntarily make an effort, instead of treating them like worker bees and themselves as the queen bees.
Fondness for the grandiose and pragmatism are two totally different administration dimensions. Whether one chooses to bully others for pleasure or use their power to help others is the benchmark for determining one’s moral integrity.
Workplace bullying usually stems from a manager’s bureaucratic mentality and eagerness for power.
Leading with heart, winning people over with virtue and treating coworkers like family are key to uniting a team and encouraging them to work together toward a common goal.
On the contrary, being condescending and arrogant, throwing documents and yelling at staff — all while claiming one’s actions as having a “kind and good purpose” — is harmful to subordinates’ dignity and the unity of a team.
Officials who bully their subordinates are as hated as corrupt officials, because they are the ones who abuse their power.
No one remains an official for their whole life. We are human beings after all. We should put ourselves in someone else’s shoes. Would anyone want to be treated like this?
Shiao Fu-song is a lecturer at National Taitung University.
Translated by Fion Khan
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian
RSS