Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock.
During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about just how invaluable democratic constitutional systems are.
On Wednesday, the South Korean legislature convened a quorum with members who were able to make it past military police and soldiers into the besieged and barricaded building. The 190 lawmakers who made it in, including 18 from Yoon’s People Power Party, unanimously cast a vote demanding the immediate lifting of martial law.
Taiwan’s laws about martial law differ significantly from those of South Korea. The implementation of martial law would require ratification within a month of its declaration — a period during which many things could happen.
Over the past several months, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party have recklessly attempted to expand the powers of the legislature, paralyze the nomination of grand justices and operations of the Constitutional Court, and slash the annual budget for the indigenous submarine program. It surely must have crossed their minds that if they went to the extreme, the Democratic Progressive Party, which holds the presidency and the Executive Yuan, might bring the weight of those institutions to bear.
Countries governed by the rule of law can operate normally, because they do so by unspoken understandings. A legislature respects the balanced relationship among the various powers jointly established by a constitution, and cannot arbitrarily expand its own powers. Likewise, presidents cannot rashly declare martial law or reduce the rights of their nations’ citizens.
The inherent discipline of declining to use a power even if one’s position affords you that power is crucial for maintaining political stability. In a highly polarized society, if one side were to rashly abandon this unspoken ethical and moral baseline, the other side would be forced to adopt even more extreme methods.
I hope Taiwan would never tread the path Yoon has taken. I also hope that this whole affair would stimulate the willingness of both political sides to broker a new path that benefits all Taiwanese. Much like the Cold War between the nuclear-powered US and Soviet Union, if both sides hold devastating power, then the most reasonable way forward would be a “balance of terror.”
Hopefully, cooler heads would prevail in the legislature. Even if some of them do not, most Taiwanese do, and can keep watch over and exert pressure on politicians, giving our dueling parties the impetus to seek a better way forward for all.
Taiwan has not seen martial law in more than 30 years, and we should never desire to go back to those days. The absolute panic that struck South Koreans after Yoon declared martial law has created political instability, despite the declaration being overturned in less than half a day. There is also the damage to South Korea’s reputation from the outcry against despotism within the international community. Such developments are something Taiwan does not need.
Hou Tsung-yu is an assistant professor in the digital content and technologies program at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Tim Smith
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS