Former Ukrainian parliamentarian Hanna Hopko, who chaired the Ukrainian parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs from 2014 to 2019, during her visit to Taiwan in May blasted those who said Ukraine should not arm itself and instead should sign a peace treaty.
Emphasizing that it is impossible to safeguard democracy without weapons, she said if Ukraine gave up on strengthening its capability and sought to sign a peace treaty with Russia, it could not save itself from the aggression of an authoritarian country and could end up in a hell-like “massacre.”
The pro-Russia camp in Ukraine tried to undermine the country’s national defense, discourage people from resisting and persuade people to accept Moscow’s “goodwill.”
The pro-China camp in Taiwan is attempting similar things. Pro-China people are trying to prevent the nation from bolstering its defense capabilities. They have even tried to destroy the foundations that former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and President William Lai (賴清德) laid for Taiwan’s defense autonomy.
Their primary target is the indigenous defense submarine (IDS) plan which could limit the Chinese military.
Taiwan’s first domestically made submarine named Hai Kun (海鯤) was launched in September last year.
Despite how “unreasonable” it is, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should respond reasonably because it is part of what KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) called the “2D strategy” — defense and dialogue.
However, the KMT has been reacting weirdly from the very beginning. Former KMT legislator Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷), a retired lieutenant general, made disparaging comments about the launch. KMT Legislator Ma Wen-chun (馬文君) was accused of leaking confidential information about the submarine to China. Then-Taipei city councilor Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯), now a KMT legislator, was also allegedly involved in an information leak case.
Some in the KMT said they would investigate Huang Shu-kuang (黃曙光), the convener of the IDS program, if the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) were to assume office.
More recently, KMT legislators have delivered another bombshell. The Ministry of National Defense had budgeted NT$1.9 billion (US$58.56 million) for the third phase of its indigenous submarine program, but Hsu proposed slashing the budget by NT$1.7 billion, a 90 percent cut, leaving just NT$200 million, while Ma and Huang Jen (黃仁) have proposed cutting the budget entirely.
The KMT and the TPP were unrestrained when they proposed cutting the military budget and tried to undermine the nation’s defense capability.
In 2004, then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) government, which had a legislative minority, proposed a special arms procurement budget that was blocked by the opposition 69 times.
Taiwan could have started earlier to build its own submarines and bolster its asymmetric warfare capabilities. Thanks to the opposition parties, progress was postponed for 20 years.
The same old trick is again being used by the pro-China camp in the legislature. Facing China’s military threat and expansionism, Taiwan certainly does not have another 20 years to waste.
Regarding the nation’s defense projects such as the IDS plan, the only one who should be unhappy about it is the neighboring country that is trying to annihilate Taiwan.
Why do the KMT and the TPP repeatedly try to undermine Taiwan’s defense capability?
Unscrupulous politicians who are willing to be the pawns of the Chinese Communist Party will eventually be judged by history.
Jethro Wang is a former secretary at the Mainland Affairs Council.
Translated by Fion Khan
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS