’Tis the season for a surge in financial frauds and scams, a huge and growing problem that caused about US$500 billion in losses globally last year, along with untold human suffering. Here is hoping policymakers resolve to bring together the resources of government and industry to finally fight back.
Confusingly, US law distinguishes between fraud and scams. Financial institutions generally must reimburse customers for unauthorized payments, or fraud, if the error is reported quickly. After all, a customer who did nothing wrong should not be liable. However, there are no such protections when customers authorize transfers to con artists. The latter crime has been growing fast, with losses from one type — investment scams — jumping 38 percent last year, to about US$4.6 billion.
Some lawmakers have been sounding the alarm, in particular about the rising number of scams using irreversible real-time payment networks such as Zelle. A US Senate subcommittee report in July called for a new requirement on banks to reimburse customers who can show they were tricked into authorizing payments to criminals. The idea was that banks would do more to prevent scams if they were on the hook for losses.
It is good that the US Congress is taking the issue seriously, but such a plan is unlikely to work. For one thing, banks already bear the costs of many types of fraud, from checks and ATM skimmers to identity theft, and have not been able to stop them. Globally, banks’ losses from such fraud total US$442 billion, about 10 times as much as consumers and businesses lost to scams. Nor would anyone expect banks to reimburse a customer who regretted giving cash to a con artist on the street. Surely the principle is the same if a payment is made with bits and bytes.
Rather than expecting the banks to police all varieties of human weakness, officials should focus on two things: sharing information and busting crooks.
One promising effort is a partnership started in July called the National Task Force on Fraud and Scam Prevention. It aims to convene experts from the US government and the private sector to devise a national strategy for addressing the problem. The idea is to find ways to improve information-sharing to offer consumers and businesses up-to-date insight about emerging scams and frauds and to assist law enforcement in taking them down and recovering lost assets.
Policymakers should build on this incipient effort. First — perhaps a job for US president-elect Donald Trump’s new department of government efficiency — they should create a single repository for frauds and scams instead of spreading information among entities such as the US Federal Trade Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. If well-designed and transparent, such a portal could provide banks and businesses — as well as regulators and law enforcement — with a one-stop shop for information on evolving crime trends.
Perhaps more important, federal prosecutors need to make frauds and scams — which, among other things, help fund international criminal organizations — a real priority. Working with allies to arrest and prosecute more high-profile perpetrators would be a good start. No effort would end such crimes completely, but authorities must show they are not helpless in the face of proliferating spam texts, spoof e-mails and other cons. Identity theft and financial scams are the two crimes that Americans say they worry about most.
Contrary to the old idiom, crime does pay — in many cases, all too well. Unless the US changes the cost-benefit equation for fraudsters and scam artists, victims would continue to proliferate. A crackdown is long overdue.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
RSS