During an interview a few days ago, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said that polls showed support for nuclear energy reached 60 to 70 percent.
Reaching a consensus on nuclear energy is not difficult, nor is achieving nuclear safety — the only issue left to address is nuclear waste, he said.
The controversy over nuclear energy in Taiwan has been going on for a decade. While supporters of nuclear energy undoubtedly exist, opposition voices persist — in the 2021 national referendum, more than 4 million people voted against a proposal to restart construction on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮), surpassing the number of supporters.
However, does one poll showing 60 to 70 percent support for nuclear energy really prove that reaching a consensus on the issue “is not difficult”?
Careful observation indicates that nearly 70 percent of respondents agreed that Taiwan has an energy shortage. Thus, support for nuclear energy likely stems from fear of an energy crisis.
The nation’s nuclear plants have almost all been decommissioned. The No. 2 reactor at the Ma-anshan plant — set to be decommissioned in May next year — was shut down on Oct. 21 and has entered a 41-day maintenance period. With more than one month having passed since the period began, Taiwan’s energy reserve capacity has maintained a rate of about 10 to 20 percent, even reaching 31.6 percent at one point. Electricity is actually abundant — we are not experiencing any energy shortage without nuclear.
Last year, Taiwan produced a total of 17.02 terawatt-hours (TWh) of nuclear electricity. Not only was this less than the 26.71 TWh of electricity produced via renewable energy sources, but it is also even lower than the government’s 2027 deep energy saving goal of 20.6 TWh. Rather than continuing the use of nuclear energy — thereby bearing the risk of a nuclear disaster and being forced to handle the difficult problem of nuclear waste — it would be more beneficial to further implement renewable energy and deep energy saving.
Taiwan’s nuclear power plants not only face the issue of aging equipment — the side plates of the core reactors in the first and second plants are cracking, the anchor plates in both reactors at the second plant are broken, the explosions of lightning arresters have led to long shut down periods and the degradation of equipment at the third plant has caused multiple fires. Furthermore, the first and second nuclear power plants are located at the foot of mountains near active fault lines; the Hengchun Fault directly passes through the third plant and the second plant is located directly above a magma chamber.
Taiwan is small and densely populated. The first three nuclear plants are located in the most densely populated capital region. Following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster of March 2011, the Japanese government forcibly evacuated all areas within a 20km to 40km radius, with 30km generally recommended. In Taiwan, evacuating a radius of that same distance would include millions of residents. The government could not possibly arrange for the placement of that many people. How could it be handled safely?
There is no nuclear consensus in Taiwan, its safety is an issue of great concern and no county or city is equipped to handle nuclear waste. Kuo should earnestly work to implement deep energy saving and promote renewable energy as a replacement for fossil fuels. Not only do energy conservation and green energy have far fewer controversies compared with nuclear energy, but they also do not carry the risk of large-scale damage.
Tsai Ya-ying is an attorney at law.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS