As the International Rescue Committee (IRC) copes with dramatic increases in displaced people in the past few years, the refugee aid organization has sought efficiencies wherever it can — including using artificial intelligence (AI).
Since 2015, the IRC has invested in Signpost — a portfolio of mobile apps and social media channels that answer questions in different languages for people in dangerous situations. The Signpost project, which includes many other organizations, has reached 18 million people so far, but the IRC wants to significantly increase its reach by using AI tools — if it can do so safely.
Conflict, climate emergencies and economic hardship have driven up demand for humanitarian assistance, with more than 117 million people forcibly displaced this year, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees said.
Illustration: Mountain People
The turn to AI technologies is in part driven by the massive gap between needs and resources.
To meet its goal of reaching half of displaced people within three years, the IRC is testing a network of AI chatbots to see if it can increase the capacity of their humanitarian officers and the local organizations that directly serve people through Signpost.
For now, the pilot project operates in El Salvador, Kenya, Greece and Italy and responds in 11 languages. It draws on a combination of large language models from some of the biggest technology companies, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.
The chatbot response system also uses customer service software from Zendesk and receives other support from Google and Cisco Systems.
If it decides the tools work, the IRC wants to extend the technical infrastructure to other nonprofit humanitarian organizations at no cost. It hope to create shared technology resources that less technically focused organizations could use without having to negotiate directly with tech companies or manage the risks of deployment.
“We’re trying to really be clear about where the legitimate concerns are, but lean into the optimism of the opportunities and not also allow the populations we serve to be left behind in solutions that have the potential to scale in a way that human to human or other technology can’t,” IRC chief research and innovation officer Jeannie Annan said.
The responses and information that Signpost chatbots deliver are vetted by local organizations to be up to date and sensitive to the precarious circumstances people could be in.
An example query that the IRC shared is of a woman from El Salvador traveling through Mexico to the US with her son who is looking for shelter and services for her child. The bot provides a list of providers in the area where she is.
The IRC said it does not facilitate migration.
More complex or sensitive queries are escalated for humans to respond.
The most important potential downside of these tools would be that they do not work. For example, what if the situation on the ground changes and the chatbot does not know? It could provide information that is not just wrong, but dangerous.
A second issue is that the tools can amass a valuable honeypot of data about vulnerable people that hostile actors could target. What if a hacker succeeds in accessing data with personal information or if that data is accidentally shared with an oppressive government?
The IRC said it has agreed with the tech providers that none of their AI models would be trained on the data that the IRC, the local organizations or the people they are serving are generating. It has also worked to anonymize the data, including removing personal information and location.
As part of the Signpost.AI project, IRC is also testing tools such as a digital automated tutor and maps that can integrate many different types of data to help prepare for and respond to crises.
Cathy Petrozzino, who works for the not-for-profit research and development company MITRE, said AI tools do have high potential, but also high risks.
She said that to use the tools responsibly, organizations should ask themselves, does the technology work? Is it fair? Are data and privacy protected?
Organizations also need to convene a range of people to help govern and design the initiative — not just technical experts, but people with deep knowledge of the context, legal experts and representatives from the groups that would use the tools, she said.
“There are many good models sitting in the AI graveyard, because they weren’t worked out in conjunction and collaboration with the user community,” she said.
For any system that has potentially life-changing effects, groups should bring in outside experts to independently assess their methodologies, Petrozzino said.
Designers of AI tools need to consider the other systems it would interact with, and they need to plan to monitor the model over time, she said.
Consulting with displaced people or others that humanitarian organizations serve might increase the time and effort needed to design these tools, but not having their input raises many safety and ethical problems, CDAC Network executive director Helen McElhinney said.
It can also unlock local knowledge.
People receiving services from humanitarian organizations should be told if an AI model would analyze any information they hand over, even if the intention is to help the organization respond better, she said.
That requires meaningful and informed consent, she said.
They should also know if an AI model is making life-changing decisions about resource allocation and where accountability for those decisions lies, she said.
Degan Ali, CEO of Adeso, a nonprofit in Somalia and Kenya, has long been an advocate for changing the power dynamics in international development to give more money and control to local organizations.
She asked how the IRC and others pursuing these technologies would overcome access issues, citing the week-long power outages caused by Hurricane Helene in the US.
Chatbots would not help when there is no device, Internet or electricity, she said.
Ali also said that few local organizations have the capacity to attend big humanitarian conferences where the ethics of AI are debated.
Few have staff senior enough and knowledgeable enough to really engage with these discussions, although they understand the potential power and effect these technologies might have, she said.
“We must be extraordinarily careful not to replicate power imbalances and biases through technology,” Ali said. “The most complex questions are always going to require local, contextual and lived experience to answer in a meaningful way.”
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS