KMT’s ‘wine’ farce
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative whip Fu Kun-chi’s former chief of staff in Hualien City, Chiang Pang-fa (蔣邦法), said during a recent city council session that “unification with China is inevitable.”
Chiang apparently thinks that China should not be provoked, that Taiwan needs to “behave” and that “one should drink sweet wine in a toast rather than being forced to drink bitter wine as a penalty.”
It is farcical that “China’s little echoes” in the KMT — including Fu — have so little concern about saying Taiwanese should give China “respect.”
Mainstream opinion is that “neither side of the Taiwan Strait is subservient to the other” and that “Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation.” The ratio of those who support joining China is vanishingly small, already a tiny minority of the nation’s populace.
Chiang’s comment that “unification is inevitable” is hogwash.
Taiwan’s democratic freedoms are renowned throughout the world. Nobody is going out of their way to annoy China, but China treats Taiwan as if it were a younger sibling, constantly threatening it.
The euphemism about “drinking sweet wine” shows that Chiang is completely on China’s side and it was a subtle threat against the homeland. He seems to be an accomplice to China’s verbal and military threats, and posturing. What he does not seem to realize is that Taiwan and China are adversaries in terms of political and military affairs, and China is the one that started it.
Chiang grew up in Taiwan, ate Taiwanese rice and was educated here. He won re-election through the democratic mechanism by Taiwanese as a representative of a Taiwanese city. His salary comes from the Taiwanese electorate.
Are there no regulations to punish him for brazenly carrying China’s water, subtly threatening the homeland and trying to sell Taiwanese on “obedience” to China while portraying himself as a benevolent actor while selling Taiwan out?
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS