KMT’s ‘wine’ farce
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislative whip Fu Kun-chi’s former chief of staff in Hualien City, Chiang Pang-fa (蔣邦法), said during a recent city council session that “unification with China is inevitable.”
Chiang apparently thinks that China should not be provoked, that Taiwan needs to “behave” and that “one should drink sweet wine in a toast rather than being forced to drink bitter wine as a penalty.”
It is farcical that “China’s little echoes” in the KMT — including Fu — have so little concern about saying Taiwanese should give China “respect.”
Mainstream opinion is that “neither side of the Taiwan Strait is subservient to the other” and that “Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation.” The ratio of those who support joining China is vanishingly small, already a tiny minority of the nation’s populace.
Chiang’s comment that “unification is inevitable” is hogwash.
Taiwan’s democratic freedoms are renowned throughout the world. Nobody is going out of their way to annoy China, but China treats Taiwan as if it were a younger sibling, constantly threatening it.
The euphemism about “drinking sweet wine” shows that Chiang is completely on China’s side and it was a subtle threat against the homeland. He seems to be an accomplice to China’s verbal and military threats, and posturing. What he does not seem to realize is that Taiwan and China are adversaries in terms of political and military affairs, and China is the one that started it.
Chiang grew up in Taiwan, ate Taiwanese rice and was educated here. He won re-election through the democratic mechanism by Taiwanese as a representative of a Taiwanese city. His salary comes from the Taiwanese electorate.
Are there no regulations to punish him for brazenly carrying China’s water, subtly threatening the homeland and trying to sell Taiwanese on “obedience” to China while portraying himself as a benevolent actor while selling Taiwan out?
Tien Fong-wen
New Taipei City
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS