Since its inception in 2016, the government’s New Southbound Policy was a fundamental component of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) initiatives to diversify Taiwan’s global interactions. The policy is frequently viewed through economic partnerships, trade diversification and interpersonal relations, but it can also be analyzed from an ontological security perspective, underscoring the significance of a state preserving its identity and existence internationally.
From an ontological security perspective, the policy seeks to enhance Taiwan’s economic links while also addressing the nation’s work to affirm its existence in the face of geopolitical challenges. The favorable reaction from Southeast Asian nations, particularly Indonesia, demonstrates the efficacy of the policy.
Ontological security pertains to a state’s necessity to preserve its identity and self-sufficiency despite adversities. The existential danger from China and the constraints of the “one China policy” have significantly influenced Taiwan’s foreign policy stance. Due to restricted access to international organizations and formal diplomatic connections, Taiwan must employ innovative strategies to assert its identity and attain recognition. The southbound policy serves as one such mechanism.
By establishing a significant and reciprocal connection with Indonesia, Taiwan surpasses the limits of formal diplomacy. Taipei fortifies its links through trade, education, health and cultural exchanges, affirming its identity and status as a contemporary, democratic and accountable global participant.
Among the southbound target nations, Indonesia distinguishes itself with its favorable reaction to the strategy. As Southeast Asia’s largest economy and a significant actor in the Indo-Pacific region, Indonesia demonstrates symbolic and practical significance in its receptiveness to Taiwan’s proposal.
The burgeoning Taiwan-Indonesia trade relationship is evidenced by bilateral trade, which is expected to exceed US$10 billion by this year. Taiwan’s involvement in Indonesia’s manufacturing and technology sectors underscores its significance as a vital economic partner.
Moreover, collaboration on energy transition initiatives, including renewable energy generation, demonstrates Taiwan’s dedication to collective regional objectives.
Indonesia’s favorable response to education and culture is evidenced by the hundreds of Indonesian students who have obtained educational scholarships from Taiwan through the southbound framework. That, in turn, augments human resource capacity and fosters enduring positive interactions between the two societies.
The favorable response to the policy in Indonesia demonstrates how it has been a vehicle for Taiwan to establish its footprint. Although without official diplomatic connections, the robust and pragmatic association established through the framework gives Taiwan a sense of presence and acknowledgment in the international arena.
The policy illustrates Taiwan’s capacity to sustain significant global interactions despite diplomatic coercion from China. The favorable response from Indonesia affirms that Taiwan’s role as a responsible and capable entity is acknowledged and valued despite the absence of official recognition.
The policy transcends mere economic or diplomatic initiative. It is a strategic initiative to enhance Taiwan’s ontological security. By focusing on mutual benefits and shared values, Taiwan can uphold its pursuit of ontological security and reinforce its position as an essential and esteemed partner in Indonesia and the Southeast Asian region.
Hafid Adim Pradana is head of laboratory in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang in Indonesia.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS