The Presidential Office on Monday thanked defense ministers from the US, Japan and Australia for their joint statement calling the stability of the Taiwan Strait “essential.”
US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Japanese Minister of Defense Gen Nakatani, and Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defense Richard Marles issued the statement at the 14th Trilateral Defense Ministers’ Meeting in Darwin, Australia, on Sunday.
“We emphasize the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and call for the peaceful resolution of cross-strait issues,” they said in the statement, which also raised concerns about Chinese activities in the South China Sea.
“It is important that all states are free to exercise rights and freedoms consistent with international law, particularly the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, including freedom of navigation and overflight and other lawful uses of the sea,” it added.
Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in response to the statement that Taiwan would “continue to strengthen its self-defense capabilities and deepen its cooperative partnerships with the US, Japan, Australia and other like-minded countries to jointly defend the rules-based international order.”
The statement came after a year of rising tensions that include at least 12 confrontations between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea, and a 300 percent surge in incursions by China into waters and airspace around Taiwan since May. Officials in the US and elsewhere have urged all sides to avoid miscalculations that could cause unintentional escalation.
That does not seem to concern Beijing, as it consistently engages in acts that push the boundaries of what countries are willing to accept before taking retaliatory measures.
China engages in frequent military drills near Taiwan, but never enters Taiwan’s contiguous zone. That allows Beijing to threaten Taiwan under the pretense of conducting regular military exercises that are purportedly not targeted at anyone specific. Some of those drills have also involved the encirclement of Taiwan proper, which analysts say are to prepare China’s military for a potential blockade of Taiwan.
As a blockade would be an act of war, Beijing might simply enact a maritime quarantine that would see its large fleet of coast guard vessels stop ships coming in and out of Taiwan’s ports. That would allow it to isolate Taiwan economically and starve it of imports.
Elsewhere in the South China Sea, China frequently blocks Philippine supply vessels and boards fishing boats in addition to using water cannons on them. These acts fall just short of what would justify a Philippine naval response or US intervention. China is unlikely to scale back such “gray zone” tactics, and might even ramp up its aggression toward other countries that are friendly to the US or Taiwan. Beijing would not be moved by formal protests and can only be contained through shows of force.
Despite its rhetoric, China does not want to end up in a conflict with the US. The point is not whether China could inflict serious damage on US forces, but that China would be devastated in such a conflict. There would be no winner in a US-China war, and even if China were to survive it would find itself economically isolated from the world’s other major economies.
That is why Beijing would never risk war with the US and why Taipei should urge Washington to re-establish a military presence in Taiwan — or, at the very least, invite Taiwan to participate in major joint military exercises, such as the Rim of the Pacific Exercise. Some experts have said the US could stockpile supplies in Taiwan, so they would be readily available in the event of conflict in the Strait.
China is increasingly antagonistic and a growing threat to stability in the Asia-Pacific region. Taiwan should seek to engage with US, Australian and Japanese militaries as much as possible to show China any act of aggression would be met with a coordinated and united response.
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
In competitive sports, the narrative surrounding transgender athletes is often clouded by misconceptions and prejudices. Critics sometimes accuse transgender athletes of “gaming the system” to gain an unfair advantage, perpetuating the stereotype that their participation undermines the integrity of competition. However, this perspective not only ignores the rigorous efforts transgender athletes invest to meet eligibility standards, but also devalues their personal and athletic achievements. Understanding the gap between these stereotypes and the reality of individual efforts requires a deeper examination of societal bias and the challenges transgender athletes face. One of the most pervasive arguments against the inclusion of transgender athletes
When viewing Taiwan’s political chaos, I often think of several lines from Incantation, a poem by the winner of the 1980 Nobel Prize in Literature, Czeslaw Milosz: “Beautiful and very young are Philo-Sophia, and poetry, her ally in the service of the good... Their friendship will be glorious, their time has no limit, their enemies have delivered themselves to destruction.” Milosz wrote Incantation when he was a professor of Slavic Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. He firmly believed that Poland would rise again under a restored democracy and liberal order. As one of several self-exiled or expelled poets from
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in