Control is the mantra with which the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) governs its people, and during his presidency, Xi Jinping (習近平) has restored its central role in society. Unprecedented levels of surveillance and a “neighbor watch thy neighbor” system are some of the methods used to maintain order among the 1.4 billion population. However, a spate of random acts of violence is challenging the “party knows best” narrative.
The CCP is paramount in China and is enmeshed within every organ of government. Its legitimacy after 75 years in power depends on continued economic growth. However, the recent downturn has hit millions of young jobseekers hard and has rippled through the workforce. There is no way of knowing whether economic reasons were behind the most dramatic of several recent tragedies that have shocked the nation, but commentary on Chinese social media has linked the violence to worries over social stability.
On Nov. 11, a 62-year-old man rammed his four-wheel drive into a crowd of pedestrians outside a downtown sports center in the southern city of Zhuhai, killing 35 people and injuring dozens more. It was the country’s deadliest known act of civilian violence during Xi’s reign.
The attacker struck after becoming disgruntled over the division of assets in his divorce settlement, reports said. He was subsequently arrested on suspicion of endangering public safety by dangerous means.
A stabbing attack last weekend that left eight people dead was also apparently the result of a personal grievance: a 21-year-old man’s unhappiness with his school over a graduation matter. Both incidents have shone an unwelcome spotlight on the government’s criminal safety record. Known random acts of violence are uncommon in China, but they are being reported more frequently and with greater detail, from state and social media.
Official outlets took more than a day to report the Zhuhai incident, and did not explain reasons for the delay. Very quickly, though, any hint of what happened was swept away, both on and offline. This level of censorship is par for the course in authoritarian regimes, but it is also a reflection of the deep fear that the party has about any mass expression of emotion that could threaten its grip on power.
“They understand that if people gather and come together, their grief can be a powerful mobilizing force,” Freedom House research director for China, Hong Kong and Taiwan Yaqiu Wang said. “They are extraordinarily afraid of any kind of collective action that could be directed at them.”
In the wake of the car killings, Xi has ordered officials to tighten security networks even further to “protect people’s lives and social stability.”
That argument is often used in clampdowns in the province of Xinjiang, where an estimated 1 million Muslim ethnic Uyghurs have been locked up in detention centers. However, the CCP is not increasing its control only over what it considers troublesome hotspots. There are more CCTV surveillance cameras in Chinese cities than anywhere else in the world. Digital authoritarianism has meant that everything from facial data and DNA, to voice imprints and even iris scans, are being collected and stored in giant databases in the name of improving public safety.
Official statistics do show declining crime levels. (Caveat: This data is being used to further cement control.) Even some independent data points to the perception that China’s law and order standards are among the best in the world. There are obvious political points to be scored. Officials often warn their citizens about mass casualty events and gun fueled violence in the US, holding up their own system of governance as superior at keeping people safe. However, this success has come at a great personal cost: individual freedom.
Authoritarian regimes use inordinate levels of control as a way to justify their hold on power. We keep you safe and in return you give us ownership over every aspect of your lives, the unsaid promise says. That deal in China has worked so long as the CCP continues to provide clear evidence that living standards are improving. When that starts to fray, people feel increasingly disaffected with their leaders and would complain.
Some brave citizens do protest.
The China Dissent Monitor, a database assessing the number of demonstrations every year, has documented more than three dozen types of dissent. These range from physical in-person protests, to those expressed through art, non-cooperation, cyber dissent and contentious petitioning or lawsuits. Many are over economic grievances, such as property and job-related issues. Such independent windows into the party’s opaque world challenge the narrative that citizens are satisfied with their government. China’s citizens are not that different from the rest of us. Sweeping problems away is not a long-term solution.
Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC’s lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades.
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS