The Hong Kong High Court on Tuesday sentenced 45 rights advocates to up to 10 years in prison following a national security trial, illustrating the contempt that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has for democracy and its insatiable desire to crush all who threaten its monopoly on political power. The punishments are a stark and important lesson for Taiwanese.
The people were arrested in 2021 on charges of conspiracy to commit subversion following unofficial primaries in 2020 to maximize their chances of winning a majority in a Hong Kong Legislative Council election. Their actions were also a response to Beijing’s two decades of suppression of democracy, and broken promises of giving the territory “a high degree of autonomy” and a pathway to universal suffrage under the terms of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and in Hong Kong’s Basic Law.
Among those sentenced were legal academic Benny Tai (戴耀廷), who shot to fame as a key leader of the “Umbrella movement” in 2014. He received the longest sentence — 10 years.
Another is former student leader Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), who in 2011, aged just 15, played a leading role in protests against a national education plan — analogous to a campaign in Taiwan in 2015 to oppose curriculum revisions. Wong was sentenced to four years and eight months.
“This move imprisons a generation of civil society leaders for holding a primary; trying to fight an election using democratic means,” journalist and author Louise Lim (林慕蓮) wrote on X.
The similarities between the situations in Hong Kong and Taiwan in their struggle for democracy and resisting the CCP go further than the “one country, two systems” model that Beijing wants. Taiwan and Hong Kong have traveled on similar trajectories in the 20th and 21st centuries. Both experienced authoritarianism, rapid economic growth and democratization at about the same time. Both are the targets of a rising China’s hegemonic project to impose its rule in its project of “Chinese rejuvenation.”
The protests that arose in Taiwan and Hong Kong in the 21st century — such as the Wild Strawberry and Sunflower movements in Taiwan, and the Occupy and Umbrella movements in Hong Kong — cannot be understood without factoring in China’s imperial project to create economic dependence to serve its political purposes, sociologist Ho Ming-sho (何明修) wrote in Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven: Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement.
However, while Taiwan’s protests were successful in protecting the nation’s democracy and creating a more open and diverse society — such as in resisting the imposition of a cross-strait services and trade agreement — Hong Kong’s protests and the dreams of democracy were crushed by the CCP. While rights advocates in Taiwan have gone on to hold elected office — Sunflower movement figures Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) and Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) are a legislator and deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council respectively, their counterparts in Hong Kong — such as Tai and Wong, and many others — have been thrown in jail. It is a stark and tragic lesson.
Today, “Taiwan maintains a vibrant democracy following a prolonged one-party authoritarian regime that lasted until 1987, whereas post-colonial Hong Kong is trapped in unfinished democratization,” Ho wrote.
Taiwanese must remain vigilant. The “united front” tactics the CCP used to subjugate Hong Kong — sowing division and co-opting politicians to build economic dependence — it is also using on Taiwan.
As Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) wrote on X on Wednesday: “The criminalization of democracy in Hong Kong recalls the dark days of Taiwan’s Martial Law era. It is also a reminder that we cannot take freedom for granted. Defending our democracy and our freedom to think, to speak, to vote and to live, is a duty.”
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
US president-elect Donald Trump earlier this year accused Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) of “stealing” the US chip business. He did so to have a favorable bargaining chip in negotiations with Taiwan. During his first term from 2017 to 2021, Trump demanded that European allies increase their military budgets — especially Germany, where US troops are stationed — and that Japan and South Korea share more of the costs for stationing US troops in their countries. He demanded that rich countries not simply enjoy the “protection” the US has provided since the end of World War II, while being stingy with
RSS