The Hong Kong High Court on Tuesday sentenced 45 rights advocates to up to 10 years in prison following a national security trial, illustrating the contempt that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has for democracy and its insatiable desire to crush all who threaten its monopoly on political power. The punishments are a stark and important lesson for Taiwanese.
The people were arrested in 2021 on charges of conspiracy to commit subversion following unofficial primaries in 2020 to maximize their chances of winning a majority in a Hong Kong Legislative Council election. Their actions were also a response to Beijing’s two decades of suppression of democracy, and broken promises of giving the territory “a high degree of autonomy” and a pathway to universal suffrage under the terms of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and in Hong Kong’s Basic Law.
Among those sentenced were legal academic Benny Tai (戴耀廷), who shot to fame as a key leader of the “Umbrella movement” in 2014. He received the longest sentence — 10 years.
Another is former student leader Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), who in 2011, aged just 15, played a leading role in protests against a national education plan — analogous to a campaign in Taiwan in 2015 to oppose curriculum revisions. Wong was sentenced to four years and eight months.
“This move imprisons a generation of civil society leaders for holding a primary; trying to fight an election using democratic means,” journalist and author Louise Lim (林慕蓮) wrote on X.
The similarities between the situations in Hong Kong and Taiwan in their struggle for democracy and resisting the CCP go further than the “one country, two systems” model that Beijing wants. Taiwan and Hong Kong have traveled on similar trajectories in the 20th and 21st centuries. Both experienced authoritarianism, rapid economic growth and democratization at about the same time. Both are the targets of a rising China’s hegemonic project to impose its rule in its project of “Chinese rejuvenation.”
The protests that arose in Taiwan and Hong Kong in the 21st century — such as the Wild Strawberry and Sunflower movements in Taiwan, and the Occupy and Umbrella movements in Hong Kong — cannot be understood without factoring in China’s imperial project to create economic dependence to serve its political purposes, sociologist Ho Ming-sho (何明修) wrote in Challenging Beijing’s Mandate of Heaven: Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement and Hong Kong’s Umbrella Movement.
However, while Taiwan’s protests were successful in protecting the nation’s democracy and creating a more open and diverse society — such as in resisting the imposition of a cross-strait services and trade agreement — Hong Kong’s protests and the dreams of democracy were crushed by the CCP. While rights advocates in Taiwan have gone on to hold elected office — Sunflower movement figures Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) and Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) are a legislator and deputy secretary-general of the National Security Council respectively, their counterparts in Hong Kong — such as Tai and Wong, and many others — have been thrown in jail. It is a stark and tragic lesson.
Today, “Taiwan maintains a vibrant democracy following a prolonged one-party authoritarian regime that lasted until 1987, whereas post-colonial Hong Kong is trapped in unfinished democratization,” Ho wrote.
Taiwanese must remain vigilant. The “united front” tactics the CCP used to subjugate Hong Kong — sowing division and co-opting politicians to build economic dependence — it is also using on Taiwan.
As Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) wrote on X on Wednesday: “The criminalization of democracy in Hong Kong recalls the dark days of Taiwan’s Martial Law era. It is also a reminder that we cannot take freedom for granted. Defending our democracy and our freedom to think, to speak, to vote and to live, is a duty.”
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS