US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Saturday last week held a face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Lima. Their dialogue has been widely interpreted as an effort by Xi to lay out China’s positions ahead of US president-elect Donald Trump taking office in two months. Chinese state media also reportedly misrepresented the meeting by claiming that Xi made an unprecedented mention of President William Lai (賴清德), a move that demonstrates China’s use of cognitive warfare tactics.
According to transcripts released by the White House and the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Xi said: “China is ready to work with a new US administration to maintain communication, expand cooperation and manage differences, so as to strive for a steady transition of the China-US relationship.”
This statement signals Xi’s concern that Trump would provoke new trade wars and diplomatic upheaval between the two leading powers, and expressed his desire to reduce tensions.
However, Xi also restated four “red lines” that the US should not challenge: the Taiwan question, democracy and human rights, China’s path and system, and China’s development right in a warning to the incoming US president.
According to the Chinese readout, Xi also mentioned Taiwan’s president and the ruling Democratic Progress Party (DPP) by name, saying: “If the US side cared about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai Ching-te and the DPP authorities in seeking Taiwan independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra prudence, unequivocally opposes Taiwan independence and supports China’s peaceful reunification.”
If Xi did mention Lai to Biden’s face, such a move would be in contrast to the tradition of Chinese leaders never directly mentioning the names of Taiwan’s leaders at international events.
Responding to an inquiry from Taiwan, US officials said that Xi did not mention any specific Taiwan leader or party during the meeting.
It has been a long-standing practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to misrepresent the contents of international meetings as part of its cognitive warfare to downplay Taiwan and to mislead the international community. After a meeting in May between South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol and the Chinese premier, Seoul said Beijing misreported that Yoon had said “South Korea adheres to the one China principle.” Yoon only said that he “respects” China’s principle, but that he remains opposed to “changing the status quo in the Taiwan Strait by force,” Seoul said.
After a meeting between the Japanese and Chinese foreign ministers in July, a Chinese news release mischaracterized then-Japanese minister of foreign affairs Yoko Kamikawa’s remarks as “Japan’s adherence to the one China principle.” She had oly expressed concern about China’s military activities and called for peace across the Taiwan Strait.
The most recent attempt — interjecting Lai’s name into the Biden-Xi meeting — was an attempt to cover up the fact that many leaders at the APEC summit have underlined the importance of peace in the Taiwan Strait. It also showed China’s intention to distract from its own role in fomenting instability in the Taiwan Strait by trying to shift the blame to Taiwan.
With China to host the 2026 APEC summit, member countries are concerned about its national security legislation and are worried it could breach the human rights of foreign attendees. However, China’s cognitive disinformation measures are more likely to be a greater challenge for APEC members and international attendees.
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS