Former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih (呂禮詩) at the opening of China’s Zhuhai Airshow on Tuesday last week said that he wanted to share with Taiwanese “how strong our China has become.”
The “military serviceman” mentioned in Article 9-3 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) refers to people who have served as a “major general or a higher rank post.”
The Ministry of National Defense and the Mainland Affairs Council said that because Lu is just a retired lieutenant commander, he is not subject to this provision.
Military personnel should have loyalty and integrity. This leniency not only sends a wrong signal to society, but also negatively impacts serving military personnel.
Lu’s case is reminiscent of retired general Tsang You-hsia (臧幼俠) standing to attention for the Chinese national anthem in an event in Hong Kong.
The ministry said Tsang was found guilty of contravening the act and it cut his pension by 75 percent for the next five years. Any honors he has received that are not related to his service would also be taken away.
A retired general usually receives a pension of NT$100,000 (US$3,082) per month. The cut would mean he would receive NT$75,000 less each month, or NT$4.5 million less over five years.
Meanwhile, a retired lieutenant commander such as Lu usually receives NT$50,000 per month. This loophole should be plugged as soon as possible.
The clause states that high-ranking officials and former officials such as generals and deputy ministers cannot participate in any “ceremony or activity held by political party, military, administrative or political agencies (institutions), or organizations of the mainland area which in turn harm the national dignity.”
That includes “saluting the flag or emblems, singing anthems or any other similar behavior that symbolize the political authority” of China, the article says.
The article was added in response to the case of retired lieutenant general Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷), who went to Beijing, stood for the Chinese national anthem and listened to a speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
It was enacted so rashly that it is problematic in terms of legal principle.
By only prohibiting people who served as a major general or a higher rank from going to China for political events, its coverage is too limited.
Anyone who has served in influential posts should also be included.
Whether a retired military serviceperson is influential should be judged on a case by case basis to avoid a one-size fits-all approach.
The article should also elaborate on what behavior is harmful to national dignity instead of generalizing it as “any other similar behavior.”
As the Chinese Communist Party is using “united front” tactics and bait, it is important that assistance mechanisms for officers be reviewed and move with the times.
The government should foresee and be aware of a standard to differentiate right from wrong and improve morale. It is the basis on which military servicemen build their character and concerns the survival and well-being of the whole nation.
Apart from condemning the retired military serviceman, the ministry and the Veterans Affairs Council should advocate for the above clause to answer to the public and to do justice to serving military personnel.
Chao Hsuey-wen is an assistant professor and holds a doctorate in law from Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Fion Khan
The return of US president-elect Donald Trump to the White House has injected a new wave of anxiety across the Taiwan Strait. For Taiwan, an island whose very survival depends on the delicate and strategic support from the US, Trump’s election victory raises a cascade of questions and fears about what lies ahead. His approach to international relations — grounded in transactional and unpredictable policies — poses unique risks to Taiwan’s stability, economic prosperity and geopolitical standing. Trump’s first term left a complicated legacy in the region. On the one hand, his administration ramped up arms sales to Taiwan and sanctioned
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan. Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP. However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) has been dubbed Taiwan’s “sacred mountain.” In the past few years, it has invested in the construction of fabs in the US, Japan and Europe, and has long been a world-leading super enterprise — a source of pride for Taiwanese. However, many erroneous news reports, some part of cognitive warfare campaigns, have appeared online, intentionally spreading the false idea that TSMC is not really a Taiwanese company. It is true that TSMC depositary receipts can be purchased on the US securities market, and the proportion of foreign investment in the company is high. However, this reflects the
RSS