In recent years, the military has seen a significant increase in instances of espionage, disciplinary infringements and other cases harmful to its image.
The unique nature of military assignments comes with far more pressure than a normal job. However, encouraging positive interpersonal interactions that promote solidarity is the most effective method for risk reduction.
The leadership styles of military officers directly influence feelings of unity and solidarity among soldiers.
Solidarity can create relationships akin to brotherhood, allowing soldiers in a unit to share aspirations and hardships. This sense of camaraderie can bring comfort despite the difficulty of some military assignments. Although the military emphasizes a hierarchical system of obedience — where every command is followed without question — officers should also work to establish close relationships with fellow soldiers. More than mere obedience, officers’ displays of genuine concern for their fellow soldiers is the best way to guarantee high morale.
The entire military must work together to establish solidarity and high morale across all ranks, along with a strong sense of shared identity within the military — this is the best way to build highly effective, battle-ready forces.
Soldiers rarely have opportunities for team-building activities or group trips. Although recreational activities are often held within barracks, they typically consist of superficial forms of entertainment and do nothing to build motivation or solidarity.
The military could use behavioral science techniques used by many businesses to foster sympathy and a shared sense of purpose within an organization, thereby enhancing work efficiency to achieve organizational goals. That approach could not only improve soldiers’ interpersonal skills, but could also promote an atmosphere of solidarity within a unit.
The confidential nature of military assignments has led to a disconnect between the military and the outside world. For this reason, many soldiers want nothing more than to relax when they have time off, which has led to many disciplinary incidents.
The military should try its best to create more opportunities for soldiers’ families to become involved in its environment.
The more family members become familiar with the military environment, the better they can understand the challenges their loved ones face. Deeper understanding from family members could help soldiers feel more relaxed, which could mitigate risks and encourage the successful completion of assignments.
In summary, risk management in the military should focus on improving the quality of leadership of military officers, cultivating team dynamics within units and allowing family members to integrate with the military environment.
Together, these measures can create strong feelings of solidarity and improve morale across all ranks, foster a sense of joint identity and build a highly effective, battle-ready military force.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS