In recent years, the military has seen a significant increase in instances of espionage, disciplinary infringements and other cases harmful to its image.
The unique nature of military assignments comes with far more pressure than a normal job. However, encouraging positive interpersonal interactions that promote solidarity is the most effective method for risk reduction.
The leadership styles of military officers directly influence feelings of unity and solidarity among soldiers.
Solidarity can create relationships akin to brotherhood, allowing soldiers in a unit to share aspirations and hardships. This sense of camaraderie can bring comfort despite the difficulty of some military assignments. Although the military emphasizes a hierarchical system of obedience — where every command is followed without question — officers should also work to establish close relationships with fellow soldiers. More than mere obedience, officers’ displays of genuine concern for their fellow soldiers is the best way to guarantee high morale.
The entire military must work together to establish solidarity and high morale across all ranks, along with a strong sense of shared identity within the military — this is the best way to build highly effective, battle-ready forces.
Soldiers rarely have opportunities for team-building activities or group trips. Although recreational activities are often held within barracks, they typically consist of superficial forms of entertainment and do nothing to build motivation or solidarity.
The military could use behavioral science techniques used by many businesses to foster sympathy and a shared sense of purpose within an organization, thereby enhancing work efficiency to achieve organizational goals. That approach could not only improve soldiers’ interpersonal skills, but could also promote an atmosphere of solidarity within a unit.
The confidential nature of military assignments has led to a disconnect between the military and the outside world. For this reason, many soldiers want nothing more than to relax when they have time off, which has led to many disciplinary incidents.
The military should try its best to create more opportunities for soldiers’ families to become involved in its environment.
The more family members become familiar with the military environment, the better they can understand the challenges their loved ones face. Deeper understanding from family members could help soldiers feel more relaxed, which could mitigate risks and encourage the successful completion of assignments.
In summary, risk management in the military should focus on improving the quality of leadership of military officers, cultivating team dynamics within units and allowing family members to integrate with the military environment.
Together, these measures can create strong feelings of solidarity and improve morale across all ranks, foster a sense of joint identity and build a highly effective, battle-ready military force.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
RSS