The “Night Ride to Kaifeng” started in June, with four university students riding 50km from Zhengzhou in China’s Henan Province to Kaifeng on public bikes in search of soup dumplings.
On Friday last week, about 100,000 joined the night biking trend. One of the university students who took part in the bike ride said they were letting off steam.
This self-mobilized, youthful adventure is a reflection of the pressure felt by young Chinese, their anxiety and feeling of helplessness about their future.
The night ride offered university students in Zhengzhou a chance to escape their oppressive school routine.
There are more than 40 universities in the city, many of which are in remote areas and adopt closed-off management.
As a result, university students usually have small social circles and limited living space.
Many of them become anxious and face a lot of pressure, especially when they apply for postgraduate schools, jobs and government employee examinations. They feel anxious and claustrophobic, struggling to breathe.
The night ride reflected the state of mind of these young people. They were desperate to participate in mass collective action in search of a sense of belonging and community.
Increasingly more young people in China have lost interest in dating, getting married, buying a house or having children.
By taking part in an unconventional event like the night ride they are choosing to avoid an uncertain future and create their own happiness and freedom outside of the social order.
Cheering for each other on the way and erupting into cheers and whistles after arriving at the destination were ways to collectively let off steam.
The event was not political in nature, but it still filled the Chinese Communist Party with a sense of apprehension. Having prevailed upon the youth about the need to work hard and put their noses to the grinding stone, it was distrustful of this show of youthful spontaneity. This disjuncture speaks volumes about the problems of social governance in China.
Young people are feeling frustrated and alienated. They face the prospect of unemployment after they graduate.
The problem cannot be solved by simply imposing restrictions or prohibitions, which could further polarize and divide society, paving the way for what could be the final straw of a potential social collapse.
Liao Ming-hui is an assistant researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Fion Khan
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each given their thoughts on Russia’s war with Ukraine. There are a few proponents of US skepticism in Taiwan taking advantage of developments to write articles claiming that the US would arbitrarily abandon Ukraine. The reality is that when one understands Trump’s negotiating habits, one sees that he brings up all variables of a situation prior to discussion, using broad negotiations to take charge. As for his ultimate goals and the aces up his sleeve, he wants to keep things vague for
RSS