Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s visit to China from Friday last week to Sunday accomplished multiple objectives, including establishing cooperation agreements. A contentious deal in Indonesia was the “Joint Statement Between the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of Indonesia on Advancing the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership and the China-Indonesia Community with a Shared Future.” Item 9 of the agreement particularly stuck out: “The two sides will jointly create more bright spots in maritime cooperation.”
That item ignited controversy in Indonesia, as it appeared that Prabowo has acknowledged China’s claims in the South China Sea, which contradicts the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and international law.
International maritime law experts in Indonesia criticized Prabowo for signing the statement, asking whether he genuinely acknowledged China’s “10-dash line” claim, particularly given that under former Indonesian president Joko Widodo’s administration, Jakarta unequivocally opposed recognizing China’s claims in the South China Sea.
The situation poses significant risks to the geopolitical dynamics in the region, particularly in Southeast Asia, as nations that staunchly oppose China’s assertions, such as Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines and Brunei Darussalam, might scrutinize Indonesia’s stance. That could undermine the cohesion among ASEAN member states, which have collectively rejected China’s claims in the South China Sea.
Prabowo’s actions sharply contradict his inaugural address on Oct. 20, when he said that Indonesia would not lag behind contending superpowers. According to the joint statement, Indonesia is trailing China.
The primary beneficiary of this statement is China, as Indonesia acknowledges Beijing’s claims in the South China Sea. Indonesia must assess if the statement is advantageous or damaging to its interests, and explain its objectives to its strategic partners. Undoubtedly, nations such as the US and Japan would be disheartened by Indonesia’s stance, as it would affect the freedom of international shipping.
The joint statement is fundamentally at odds with Article 8 of Indonesia’s 2008 Law No. 43 on the territory of the state, which does not acknowledge maritime boundaries with China as asserted in the joint statement. Furthermore, Article 10 stipulates that negotiations with other nations concerning the delineation of state territorial boundaries must adhere to legal provisions and international law.
A more profound examination reveals Indonesia’s contravention of UNCLOS regulations in formulating the joint statement.
The concern is that China might use Indonesia — the largest country in Southeast Asia — as a conduit to persuade other nations to acknowledge its claims in the South China Sea. Prabowo must address the issue upon his return, as some believe he was meticulously deliberate and calculating in endorsing the joint statement.
M. Syaprin Zahidi is a senior lecturer in the Department of International Relations at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang and is a doctoral student at Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government at the Universiti Utara Malaysia.
World leaders are preparing themselves for a second Donald Trump presidency. Some leaders know more or less where he stands: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy knows that a difficult negotiation process is about to be forced on his country, and the leaders of NATO countries would be well aware of being complacent about US military support with Trump in power. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would likely be feeling relief as the constraints placed on him by the US President Joe Biden administration would finally be released. However, for President William Lai (賴清德) the calculation is not simple. Trump has surrounded himself
US president-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday named US Representative Mike Waltz, a vocal supporter of arms sales to Taiwan who has called China an “existential threat,” as his national security advisor, and on Thursday named US Senator Marco Rubio, founding member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China — a global, cross-party alliance to address the challenges that China poses to the rules-based order — as his secretary of state. Trump’s appointments, including US Representative Elise Stefanik as US ambassador to the UN, who has been a strong supporter of Taiwan in the US Congress, and Robert Lighthizer as US trade
Following the BRICS summit held in Kazan, Russia, last month, media outlets circulated familiar narratives about Russia and China’s plans to dethrone the US dollar and build a BRICS-led global order. Each summit brings renewed buzz about a BRICS cross-border payment system designed to replace the SWIFT payment system, allowing members to trade without using US dollars. Articles often highlight the appeal of this concept to BRICS members — bypassing sanctions, reducing US dollar dependence and escaping US influence. They say that, if widely adopted, the US dollar could lose its global currency status. However, none of these articles provide
On Friday last week, tens of thousands of young Chinese took part in a bike ride overnight from Henan Province’s Zhengzhou (鄭州) to the historical city of Kaifeng in search of breakfast. The night ride became a viral craze after four female university students in June chronicled their ride on social media from Zhengzhou in search of soup dumplings in Kaifeng. Propelled by the slogan “youth is priceless,” the number of nocturnal riders surged to about 100,000 on Friday last week. The main road connecting the two cities was crammed with cyclists as police tried to maintain order. That sparked
RSS