US president-elect Donald Trump is to return to the White House in January, but his second term would surely be different from the first. His Cabinet would not include former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo and former US national security adviser John Bolton, both outspoken supporters of Taiwan.
Trump is expected to implement a transactionalist approach to Taiwan, including measures such as demanding that Taiwan pay a high “protection fee” or requiring that Taiwan’s military spending amount to at least 10 percent of its GDP.
However, if the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) invades Taiwan, it is doubtful that Trump would dispatch US troops in its defense.
He has also vowed to repeal subsidies for the construction of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) factories in the US and impose heavy tariffs on Taiwanese chips.
Trump’s policies, whether with regard to national security or the economy, would prove detrimental to Taiwan.
In light of this, Taiwan should take the following measures in response to Trump’s proposed policies:
First, to address national defense and US-Taiwan economic issues, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration should make use of the US Congress, prominent think tanks, public opinion and other channels.
The government can approach the issues from angles of economic benefits and transactionalism — which Trump cares about the most — and allow him to understand one thing clearly.
Should his new policies cause Taiwan to be invaded by the CCP, it would harm US strategic interests and severely affect the US economy and industrial development, resulting in global economic damage, all costs that the US cannot afford.
Regarding the globalized economy, Taiwan holds a strategic position between the two main maritime passages connecting Northeast Asia and the South China Sea. The South China Sea is the primary energy supply route for Northeast Asian countries and an important shipping route to Europe and Africa. It is the maritime transportation and communications route maintaining Japan’s lifeline.
Taiwan is also an indispensable transit hub connecting Japan to India — Japan’s promotion of a high-tech corridor between New Delhi and Mumbai would be difficult to implement without Taiwan’s participation.
Additionally, Taiwan’s leading position in global high-tech industries allows it to provide the US with 90 percent of its low-cost, advanced chips. The US knows well that it would be unable to operate without Taiwan.
If Trump’s negligence results in a CCP invasion of Taiwan, the US and global economies would suffer heavy consequences; it could lead to a 2 percent or more decline in GDP. Japan’s maritime defense line and the shipping routes between Japan and Europe would fall into China’s hands. Furthermore, it would be a major hit to US strategic and economic interests in the Asia-Pacific region.
Such severe repercussions far outweigh the economic benefits Trump might gain from forcing Taiwan to pay a “protection fee.” The president-elect himself must consider them carefully.
Taiwan must make Trump understand that it is more vital than Ukraine and must not be abandoned. Without diligent Taiwanese working late into the night researching and manufacturing chips, or Taiwan’s important economic and strategic position in aiding and safeguarding US economic and industrial development, US strength and prosperity would be compromised.
Taiwan must stand tall and demand that Trump not force the country into excessive defense spending to prevent significant strain on social welfare and other public works. Otherwise, it could result in an opportunity for the CCP and greatly damage the US economy.
Taiwan is already gradually raising defense spending and would continue to pursue military procurement from the US. The government should take advantage of this opportunity to request the US sale of F-35 stealth jets, Aegis-capable ships, nuclear submarines and other advanced weapons.
The US does not have troops stationed in Taiwan, so it should not collect “protection fees.” Taiwan protects US economic and strategic interests. The US and Taiwan have a mutually beneficial — not unilateral — relationship.
If Trump wants Taiwan to pay a “protection fee,” Taiwan would gladly sign a mutual defense treaty with the US. Under such an agreement, the US could station troops in Taiwan in exchange for a defense fee.
The government should make Trump understand that Taiwan has not stolen the US’ semiconductor business. It is Taiwan’s contribution of advanced chips to US companies such as Nvidia and Apple that allows the US high-tech industry and economy to prosper.
If Trump insists on imposing tariffs on Taiwanese chips or cutting subsidies for the construction of TSMC fabs, the US’ high-tech industry, economy, national defense industry, auto industry and other sectors would be severely affected. It would ultimately be damaging for the US.
The Trump administration should think carefully before proceeding with its proposed Taiwan policies. Having just won the election, now is the perfect time for Trump and his incoming administration to make some necessary adjustments to avoid harming the US and others.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS