The nation’s two major economic research institutes last week warned that US president-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House would create uncertainty for Taiwan’s foreign trade outlook and Taiwanese firms’ global investment plans, given his extreme policy proposals on tariffs, corporate taxes and border security. They urged Taipei to communicate clearly with Washington on trade issues and pay close attention to any changes in US policies so that Taiwan can prepare contingency plans.
Taiwan Institute of Economic Research president Chang Chien-yi (張建一) said at a seminar on Thursday that the key word next year would be “trade,” while Daniel Liu (劉大年), director of the Regional Development Study Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, said at a conference on Friday that “tariffs” would be the main focus of Trump’s trade policy.
On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly threatened to impose an additional 10 to 20 percent tariff on all goods imported into the US, as well as levy a 60 percent tariff on Chinese goods once he returns to office.
He said it would incentivize companies to return to the US to manufacture goods. Regardless of whether Trump’s trade proposals are simply campaign rhetoric, in his first term, he raised tariffs on imported Chinese products four times.
Trump would likely use the threat of imposing tariffs as a negotiating tactic and bargaining chip to win concessions from China and the US’ key trade partners.
The Republican Party has reclaimed control of the US Senate and is likely to retain control of the US House of Representatives, enabling Trump to govern without obstacles. He could use his executive power to adjust or implement new policies to cut taxes and tighten immigration, or repeal the policies of US President Joe Biden, such by as removing subsidies or preferential treatment for industries such as semiconductors and green energy.
Moreover, Trump’s dislike of manufacturing “offshoring” and his willingness to escalate a trade and technology rivalry with China are likely to accelerate the realignment of global supply chains, which warrants close attention from Taiwanese firms.
The prospect of a reduction in the US’ military commitments to its allies and a smaller US role on the international stage during the “Trump 2.0” era would also affect economies in the region, including Taiwan and South Korea.
Trump has voiced his dissatisfaction with the US’ rising trade deficit and Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US, which might exceed its surplus with China this year. If the next Trump administration implements high tariffs, Taiwan’s exports would be significantly affected, so the government must start formulating contingency plans.
Trump’s second term in office could be characterized by higher US tariffs and other protectionist measures on imports, and a wider range of pressures on China and on those who do business with China.
Whether it is trade, tariffs, semiconductors or protection fees, many challenges could lie ahead for Taiwan in the next four years.
The government must make early adjustments to cope with the new Taiwan-US relationship, and investors should expect greater market fluctuations in the near term amid uncertainty until Trump takes office.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS