The nation’s two major economic research institutes last week warned that US president-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House would create uncertainty for Taiwan’s foreign trade outlook and Taiwanese firms’ global investment plans, given his extreme policy proposals on tariffs, corporate taxes and border security. They urged Taipei to communicate clearly with Washington on trade issues and pay close attention to any changes in US policies so that Taiwan can prepare contingency plans.
Taiwan Institute of Economic Research president Chang Chien-yi (張建一) said at a seminar on Thursday that the key word next year would be “trade,” while Daniel Liu (劉大年), director of the Regional Development Study Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, said at a conference on Friday that “tariffs” would be the main focus of Trump’s trade policy.
On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly threatened to impose an additional 10 to 20 percent tariff on all goods imported into the US, as well as levy a 60 percent tariff on Chinese goods once he returns to office.
He said it would incentivize companies to return to the US to manufacture goods. Regardless of whether Trump’s trade proposals are simply campaign rhetoric, in his first term, he raised tariffs on imported Chinese products four times.
Trump would likely use the threat of imposing tariffs as a negotiating tactic and bargaining chip to win concessions from China and the US’ key trade partners.
The Republican Party has reclaimed control of the US Senate and is likely to retain control of the US House of Representatives, enabling Trump to govern without obstacles. He could use his executive power to adjust or implement new policies to cut taxes and tighten immigration, or repeal the policies of US President Joe Biden, such by as removing subsidies or preferential treatment for industries such as semiconductors and green energy.
Moreover, Trump’s dislike of manufacturing “offshoring” and his willingness to escalate a trade and technology rivalry with China are likely to accelerate the realignment of global supply chains, which warrants close attention from Taiwanese firms.
The prospect of a reduction in the US’ military commitments to its allies and a smaller US role on the international stage during the “Trump 2.0” era would also affect economies in the region, including Taiwan and South Korea.
Trump has voiced his dissatisfaction with the US’ rising trade deficit and Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US, which might exceed its surplus with China this year. If the next Trump administration implements high tariffs, Taiwan’s exports would be significantly affected, so the government must start formulating contingency plans.
Trump’s second term in office could be characterized by higher US tariffs and other protectionist measures on imports, and a wider range of pressures on China and on those who do business with China.
Whether it is trade, tariffs, semiconductors or protection fees, many challenges could lie ahead for Taiwan in the next four years.
The government must make early adjustments to cope with the new Taiwan-US relationship, and investors should expect greater market fluctuations in the near term amid uncertainty until Trump takes office.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS