Apart from unwillingly handing over its revenue to transnational digital platforms, the journalism industry is also facing challenges from generative artificial intelligence (AI).
These AI tools generate content to replace news media after using a large amount of news content to conduct modularized training, and yet most AI companies do not pay for the rights to use the content they train their models on.
Facing such unfair treatment, news outlets from different countries have started to fight for their rights. Google was fined 250 million euros (US$268 million) in March by French regulators for breaching an agreement to pay media companies for reproducing their content online, and for training on content from publishers and news agencies without notifying them.
This is the latest action from France’s competition watchdog against Google for its disputes over payments to news agencies.
The New York Times has also sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement. The lawsuit, filed in a Manhattan federal district court, claims that the firms train AI chatbots using articles published by the paper without its permission.
The New York Times is reportedly claiming billions of dollars in damages. From the paper’s perspective, the companies seek to have a “free ride” on its investment in journalism.
US writers and comedians have also said AI companies use their work to generate content that imitates their style without compensating them despite making profit from it.
News agencies in our country have recently demanded transnational digital platforms pay for their content. They have also started reviewing to what extent their content is used to train AI tools, in what ways they should be compensated and what legal options they could resort to.
What we could learn from these international lawsuits is that individual news outlets should not be left alone when they negotiate with transnational digital platforms. State power should be exercised proportionately in this process to fight for a satisfactory result for news outlets in our country.
Despite having massive resources, transnational digital platforms provide little compensation to media companies. The government should not allow press agencies to be at the mercy of digital platforms.
The government should ensure news outlets are able to maintain sustainable and reasonable revenue by legislating for it — bargaining for their share of revenue should come first. This is the only way to support a democratic society and a healthy media industry.
Dino Wei works in the information technology industry.
Translated by Fion Khan
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS