As a Palestinian from Gaza residing in Taiwan, I value the nation’s commitment to democratic principles, education, family and freedom. These values resonate deeply with Palestinians and are rooted in our own traditions.
Yet, I must ask: Can a country that claims to uphold freedom and democracy sincerely do so while denying other people these very rights?
Israel’s representative in Taiwan describes a “mutual liberal democratic way of living.” However, this concept is undermined when Israel, as an occupying power, systematically restricts Palestinians’ freedom, denies them their right to return to their homes from which they were displaced and confines generations of families to refugee camps.
How can true freedom exist when one side imposes control over another, stripping them of autonomy and dignity?
The article speaks of Israel as the world’s only “Jewish state.” Yet, we must ask: What does it mean for a state to be defined by religion, granting citizenship to people based on faith, while denying fundamental rights to the native Palestinian population, Muslim and Christian alike?
The idea of a country built on exclusive religious identity, with laws that privilege one group over another, raises difficult questions about equality and human rights. This approach has created a two-tier system that deprives Palestinians of civil rights, something that does not align with democratic ideals.
The piece claims that Israel has made repeated efforts to pursue peace, yet it overlooks a crucial reality: Peace cannot exist without justice. Palestinians have witnessed repeated refusals by Israel to engage with internationally supported peace initiatives aimed at ending the occupation.
Calls for “peace for peace,” without addressing the occupation’s root causes, fall short of genuine reconciliation and contravene international resolutions that mandate Israel’s withdrawal from occupied territories. True peace demands a commitment to end injustice, not to preserve it.
The representative writes about the Jewish people’s ancestral homeland, implying that Palestinians wish to “erase” Jewish presence from the land. This is an oversimplification that distorts history and ignores the fundamental issue.
Palestinians are not struggling against Jewish identity or faith; they are fighting for their right to live freely in their homeland, just as they have alongside their Jewish neighbors since long before the Zionist political project began.
The repeated narrative of survival is another point used to justify Israel’s actions, casting Zionist settlers as perpetual victims forced to “stand up and fight.”
Yet, it is crucial to remember that security does not require oppression, and survival does not justify the occupation of other people’s land.
The Palestinian cause is grounded in resistance against the injustice of displacement, not in erasing anyone’s identity or existence. Faulty readings of history should not be used to justify one group’s suffering over another’s.
Lastly, there is a call to free the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. Indeed, humanitarian concerns are paramount, and the value of every life is unquestionable.
However, if Israel’s government genuinely values human life, then the world must also demand an end to the bombardments, mass killings and tragic scenes of people being burned alive in their own homes.
To speak of humanity, one must act with humanity on both sides, upholding the principle that all lives are equally valuable, Palestinian and Israeli alike.
The journey toward justice requires recognizing the humanity of all people involved, with neither side imposing its will at the cost of the other side’s freedom and dignity.
For peace to be real and lasting, it must be rooted in justice, equality and the acknowledgement of all historical truths — not selective readings designed to justify ongoing oppression.
The world, including Taiwan, must support a vision of peace that respects every individual’s right to live in their homeland freely and safely, and that brings an end to the tragedies inflicted by occupation and denial of fundamental human rights.
Hazem Almassry is a Palestinian from Gaza living in Taiwan.
Would China attack Taiwan during the American lame duck period? For months, there have been worries that Beijing would seek to take advantage of an American president slowed by age and a potentially chaotic transition to make a move on Taiwan. In the wake of an American election that ended without drama, that far-fetched scenario will likely prove purely hypothetical. But there is a crisis brewing elsewhere in Asia — one with which US president-elect Donald Trump may have to deal during his first days in office. Tensions between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have been at
A nation has several pillars of national defense, among them are military strength, energy and food security, and national unity. Military strength is very much on the forefront of the debate, while several recent editorials have dealt with energy security. National unity and a sense of shared purpose — especially while a powerful, hostile state is becoming increasingly menacing — are problematic, and would continue to be until the nation’s schizophrenia is properly managed. The controversy over the past few days over former navy lieutenant commander Lu Li-shih’s (呂禮詩) usage of the term “our China” during an interview about his attendance
Bo Guagua (薄瓜瓜), the son of former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee Politburo member and former Chongqing Municipal Communist Party secretary Bo Xilai (薄熙來), used his British passport to make a low-key entry into Taiwan on a flight originating in Canada. He is set to marry the granddaughter of former political heavyweight Hsu Wen-cheng (許文政), the founder of Luodong Poh-Ai Hospital in Yilan County’s Luodong Township (羅東). Bo Xilai is a former high-ranking CCP official who was once a challenger to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) for the chairmanship of the CCP. That makes Bo Guagua a bona fide “third-generation red”
Historically, in Taiwan, and in present-day China, many people advocate the idea of a “great Chinese nation.” It is not worth arguing with extremists to say that the so-called “great Chinese nation” is a fabricated political myth rather than an academic term. Rather, they should read the following excerpt from Chinese writer Lin Yutang’s (林語堂) book My Country and My People: “It is also inevitable that I should offend many writers about China, especially my own countrymen and great patriots. These great patriots — I have nothing to do with them, for their god is not my god, and their patriotism is
RSS