As a Palestinian from Gaza residing in Taiwan, I value the nation’s commitment to democratic principles, education, family and freedom. These values resonate deeply with Palestinians and are rooted in our own traditions.
Yet, I must ask: Can a country that claims to uphold freedom and democracy sincerely do so while denying other people these very rights?
Israel’s representative in Taiwan describes a “mutual liberal democratic way of living.” However, this concept is undermined when Israel, as an occupying power, systematically restricts Palestinians’ freedom, denies them their right to return to their homes from which they were displaced and confines generations of families to refugee camps.
How can true freedom exist when one side imposes control over another, stripping them of autonomy and dignity?
The article speaks of Israel as the world’s only “Jewish state.” Yet, we must ask: What does it mean for a state to be defined by religion, granting citizenship to people based on faith, while denying fundamental rights to the native Palestinian population, Muslim and Christian alike?
The idea of a country built on exclusive religious identity, with laws that privilege one group over another, raises difficult questions about equality and human rights. This approach has created a two-tier system that deprives Palestinians of civil rights, something that does not align with democratic ideals.
The piece claims that Israel has made repeated efforts to pursue peace, yet it overlooks a crucial reality: Peace cannot exist without justice. Palestinians have witnessed repeated refusals by Israel to engage with internationally supported peace initiatives aimed at ending the occupation.
Calls for “peace for peace,” without addressing the occupation’s root causes, fall short of genuine reconciliation and contravene international resolutions that mandate Israel’s withdrawal from occupied territories. True peace demands a commitment to end injustice, not to preserve it.
The representative writes about the Jewish people’s ancestral homeland, implying that Palestinians wish to “erase” Jewish presence from the land. This is an oversimplification that distorts history and ignores the fundamental issue.
Palestinians are not struggling against Jewish identity or faith; they are fighting for their right to live freely in their homeland, just as they have alongside their Jewish neighbors since long before the Zionist political project began.
The repeated narrative of survival is another point used to justify Israel’s actions, casting Zionist settlers as perpetual victims forced to “stand up and fight.”
Yet, it is crucial to remember that security does not require oppression, and survival does not justify the occupation of other people’s land.
The Palestinian cause is grounded in resistance against the injustice of displacement, not in erasing anyone’s identity or existence. Faulty readings of history should not be used to justify one group’s suffering over another’s.
Lastly, there is a call to free the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. Indeed, humanitarian concerns are paramount, and the value of every life is unquestionable.
However, if Israel’s government genuinely values human life, then the world must also demand an end to the bombardments, mass killings and tragic scenes of people being burned alive in their own homes.
To speak of humanity, one must act with humanity on both sides, upholding the principle that all lives are equally valuable, Palestinian and Israeli alike.
The journey toward justice requires recognizing the humanity of all people involved, with neither side imposing its will at the cost of the other side’s freedom and dignity.
For peace to be real and lasting, it must be rooted in justice, equality and the acknowledgement of all historical truths — not selective readings designed to justify ongoing oppression.
The world, including Taiwan, must support a vision of peace that respects every individual’s right to live in their homeland freely and safely, and that brings an end to the tragedies inflicted by occupation and denial of fundamental human rights.
Hazem Almassry is a Palestinian from Gaza living in Taiwan.
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
The US Department of State has removed the phrase “we do not support Taiwan independence” in its updated Taiwan-US relations fact sheet, which instead iterates that “we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait.” This shows a tougher stance rejecting China’s false claims of sovereignty over Taiwan. Since switching formal diplomatic recognition from the Republic of China to the People’s Republic of China in 1979, the US government has continually indicated that it “does not support Taiwan independence.” The phrase was removed in 2022
RSS