Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Wang Ting-yu (王定宇) on Sunday last week said laws should be amended to increase penalties for acts of treason, citing attempts by Beijing to undermine morale in the armed forces. In one case, two junior officers allegedly filmed themselves saying they would surrender to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, while a lieutenant colonel allegedly agreed to fly a Chinook helicopter to defect to China.
All acts of treason and espionage are dangerous given the existential threat China poses to Taiwan, but those involving current or retired military personnel are particularly egregious. If the military demonstrated itself to be incapable or unwilling to resist a Chinese invasion, there would be no point in the US or any other country getting involved in the defense of Taiwan.
With the military in the past several years moving away from conscription toward relying mostly on volunteer soldiers, recruitment would suffer if the public believed that the military would simply capitulate in the event of a cross-strait conflict. Further exacerbating the situation is Taiwan’s declining birthrate, meaning that the pool of eligible recruits would continue to shrink.
Effectively tackling treason and increasing resilience among the armed forces requires tougher penalties for treasonous acts by current and retired military personnel and politicians, such as a ban on travel to China for military personnel and politicians for 10 years after retirement, and sweeping reforms to make service in the armed forces a more attractive prospect for potential recruits. Penalties for expressing allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) should extend to those who have retired from public service. It should also be explicitly defined in law that pledges to the CCP by current or retired public servants are beyond the scope of free speech, as such expressions potentially endanger national security.
As many acts of treason occur when current or retired public servants travel to China, banning such travel would make it harder for the CCP to influence Taiwanese affairs. Of course, tackling the motivations for treason in the first place would be the most effective approach to curbing such acts, but that is only possible if the motivations are financial. Those who are ideologically driven would not be swayed by incentives, so the military and government should devise ways of assessing and vetting candidates for higher positions to prevent those with pro-CCP leanings from obtaining positions of power.
To ensure the military can meet its recruitment needs, the government should consider raising salaries and offering sign-up bonuses, among other perks. Training should also be more practical, and duties should be commensurate with a recruit’s interests and skill set. For example, those interested in firearms and close-quarters combat should receive training in weapons and martial arts, while those with technical skills should have the option to train in drone operations or cyberwarfare.
The armed forces could also communicate with foreign militaries about the possibility of Taiwanese soldiers participating in combat scenarios abroad. The roughly 30 Taiwanese fighting in the war in Ukraine as part of the International Legion for the Defence of Ukraine are evidence of the interest of some soldiers in obtaining real combat experience. That experience would be invaluable to Taiwan in the event of a conflict. An increased number of opportunities for exchanges or training in the US or elsewhere could serve as motivation for some potential recruits.
An opinion piece published on June 14 by the Web site Domino Theory cited Kitsch Liao (廖彥棻), assistant director of the Global China Hub at the Atlantic Council in Washington, as saying that the navy and air force have fewer recruits than needed. Therefore, the military should focus on recruiting and training for those areas.
Taiwan must eliminate CCP collaborators and boost military recruitment numbers before it is too late.
The US election result will significantly impact its foreign policy with global implications. As tensions escalate in the Taiwan Strait and conflicts elsewhere draw attention away from the western Pacific, Taiwan was closely monitoring the election, as many believe that whoever won would confront an increasingly assertive China, especially with speculation over a potential escalation in or around 2027. A second Donald Trump presidency naturally raises questions concerning the future of US policy toward China and Taiwan, with Trump displaying mixed signals as to his position on the cross-strait conflict. US foreign policy would also depend on Trump’s Cabinet and
The Taiwanese have proven to be resilient in the face of disasters and they have resisted continuing attempts to subordinate Taiwan to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Nonetheless, the Taiwanese can and should do more to become even more resilient and to be better prepared for resistance should the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) try to annex Taiwan. President William Lai (賴清德) argues that the Taiwanese should determine their own fate. This position continues the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) tradition of opposing the CCP’s annexation of Taiwan. Lai challenges the CCP’s narrative by stating that Taiwan is not subordinate to the
Republican candidate and former US president Donald Trump is to be the 47th president of the US after beating his Democratic rival, US Vice President Kamala Harris, in the election on Tuesday. Trump’s thumping victory — winning 295 Electoral College votes against Harris’ 226 as of press time last night, along with the Republicans winning control of the US Senate and possibly the House of Representatives — is a remarkable political comeback from his 2020 defeat to US President Joe Biden, and means Trump has a strong political mandate to implement his agenda. What does Trump’s victory mean for Taiwan, Asia, deterrence
The Taipei District Court on Nov. 1 agreed to extend the detention of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for his suspected involvement in corruption involving a real-estate project during his time as Taipei mayor. Different voices are beginning to emerge from within the TPP about how to respond to their extended leaderless situation. Following a string of scandals coming to light since early August, including the TPP’s misreporting of election campaign finances and Ko’s alleged corruption related to the Core Pacific City redevelopment project, Ko on Aug. 29 announced he would take a three-month leave of absence from